MLAB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Focus Universal has a net margin of 5.93% compared to Mesa Laboratories's net margin of -6910.88%. Mesa Laboratories's return on equity of -98.4% beat Focus Universal's return on equity of -82.24%.

Mesa Laboratories has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.59%. On the other hand Focus Universal has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mesa Laboratories has higher upside potential than Focus Universal, analysts believe Mesa Laboratories is more attractive than Focus Universal.

Mesa Laboratories has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Focus Universal has a beta of -0.238, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.807%.

Mesa Laboratories has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Focus Universal offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mesa Laboratories pays -1.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Focus Universal pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mesa Laboratories quarterly revenues are $57.8M, which are larger than Focus Universal quarterly revenues of $74.2K. Mesa Laboratories's net income of $3.4M is higher than Focus Universal's net income of $1.4M. Notably, Mesa Laboratories's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Focus Universal's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mesa Laboratories is 3.12x versus 15.27x for Focus Universal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Keysight Technologies has a net margin of 5.93% compared to Mesa Laboratories's net margin of -5.67%. Mesa Laboratories's return on equity of -98.4% beat Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 12.43%.

Mesa Laboratories has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.59%. On the other hand Keysight Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $163.40 which suggests that it could grow by 10.12%. Given that Keysight Technologies has higher upside potential than Mesa Laboratories, analysts believe Keysight Technologies is more attractive than Mesa Laboratories.

Mesa Laboratories has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.23%.

Mesa Laboratories has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Keysight Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mesa Laboratories pays -1.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Keysight Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mesa Laboratories quarterly revenues are $57.8M, which are smaller than Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Mesa Laboratories's net income of $3.4M is higher than Keysight Technologies's net income of -$73M. Notably, Mesa Laboratories's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Keysight Technologies's PE ratio is 46.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mesa Laboratories is 3.12x versus 5.77x for Keysight Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qorvo has a net margin of 5.93% compared to Mesa Laboratories's net margin of -1.67%. Mesa Laboratories's return on equity of -98.4% beat Qorvo's return on equity of -3.94%.

Mesa Laboratories has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.59%. On the other hand Qorvo has an analysts' consensus of $115.80 which suggests that it could grow by 30.4%. Given that Qorvo has higher upside potential than Mesa Laboratories, analysts believe Qorvo is more attractive than Mesa Laboratories.

Mesa Laboratories has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qorvo has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.366%.

Mesa Laboratories has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Qorvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mesa Laboratories pays -1.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Qorvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mesa Laboratories quarterly revenues are $57.8M, which are smaller than Qorvo quarterly revenues of $1B. Mesa Laboratories's net income of $3.4M is higher than Qorvo's net income of -$17.4M. Notably, Mesa Laboratories's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Qorvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mesa Laboratories is 3.12x versus 1.74x for Qorvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sono-Tek has a net margin of 5.93% compared to Mesa Laboratories's net margin of 6.58%. Mesa Laboratories's return on equity of -98.4% beat Sono-Tek's return on equity of 10.87%.

Mesa Laboratories has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.59%. On the other hand Sono-Tek has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 131.09%. Given that Sono-Tek has higher upside potential than Mesa Laboratories, analysts believe Sono-Tek is more attractive than Mesa Laboratories.

Mesa Laboratories has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.249, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.87%.

Mesa Laboratories has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Sono-Tek offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mesa Laboratories pays -1.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Sono-Tek pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mesa Laboratories quarterly revenues are $57.8M, which are larger than Sono-Tek quarterly revenues of $5M. Mesa Laboratories's net income of $3.4M is higher than Sono-Tek's net income of $330.8K. Notably, Mesa Laboratories's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sono-Tek's PE ratio is 46.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mesa Laboratories is 3.12x versus 3.18x for Sono-Tek. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.