SOTK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Focus Universal has a net margin of 6.58% compared to Sono-Tek's net margin of -6910.88%. Sono-Tek's return on equity of 10.87% beat Focus Universal's return on equity of -82.24%.

Sono-Tek has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 131.09%. On the other hand Focus Universal has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sono-Tek has higher upside potential than Focus Universal, analysts believe Sono-Tek is more attractive than Focus Universal.

Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.249, which suggesting that the stock is 124.87% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Focus Universal has a beta of -0.238, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.807%.

Sono-Tek has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Focus Universal offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sono-Tek pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Focus Universal pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sono-Tek quarterly revenues are $5M, which are larger than Focus Universal quarterly revenues of $74.2K. Sono-Tek's net income of $330.8K is lower than Focus Universal's net income of $1.4M. Notably, Sono-Tek's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.28x while Focus Universal's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sono-Tek is 3.18x versus 15.27x for Focus Universal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Keysight Technologies has a net margin of 6.58% compared to Sono-Tek's net margin of -5.67%. Sono-Tek's return on equity of 10.87% beat Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 12.43%.

Sono-Tek has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 131.09%. On the other hand Keysight Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $163.40 which suggests that it could grow by 10.12%. Given that Sono-Tek has higher upside potential than Keysight Technologies, analysts believe Sono-Tek is more attractive than Keysight Technologies.

Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.249, which suggesting that the stock is 124.87% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.23%.

Sono-Tek has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keysight Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sono-Tek pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keysight Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sono-Tek quarterly revenues are $5M, which are smaller than Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Sono-Tek's net income of $330.8K is higher than Keysight Technologies's net income of -$73M. Notably, Sono-Tek's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.28x while Keysight Technologies's PE ratio is 46.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sono-Tek is 3.18x versus 5.77x for Keysight Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mesa Laboratories has a net margin of 6.58% compared to Sono-Tek's net margin of 5.93%. Sono-Tek's return on equity of 10.87% beat Mesa Laboratories's return on equity of -98.4%.

Sono-Tek has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 131.09%. On the other hand Mesa Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1.59%. Given that Sono-Tek has higher upside potential than Mesa Laboratories, analysts believe Sono-Tek is more attractive than Mesa Laboratories.

Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.249, which suggesting that the stock is 124.87% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mesa Laboratories has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.809%.

Sono-Tek has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mesa Laboratories offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Sono-Tek pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mesa Laboratories pays out -1.36% of its earnings as a dividend.

Sono-Tek quarterly revenues are $5M, which are smaller than Mesa Laboratories quarterly revenues of $57.8M. Sono-Tek's net income of $330.8K is lower than Mesa Laboratories's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Sono-Tek's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.28x while Mesa Laboratories's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sono-Tek is 3.18x versus 3.12x for Mesa Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qorvo has a net margin of 6.58% compared to Sono-Tek's net margin of -1.67%. Sono-Tek's return on equity of 10.87% beat Qorvo's return on equity of -3.94%.

Sono-Tek has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 131.09%. On the other hand Qorvo has an analysts' consensus of $115.80 which suggests that it could grow by 30.4%. Given that Sono-Tek has higher upside potential than Qorvo, analysts believe Sono-Tek is more attractive than Qorvo.

Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.249, which suggesting that the stock is 124.87% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qorvo has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.366%.

Sono-Tek has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qorvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sono-Tek pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qorvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sono-Tek quarterly revenues are $5M, which are smaller than Qorvo quarterly revenues of $1B. Sono-Tek's net income of $330.8K is higher than Qorvo's net income of -$17.4M. Notably, Sono-Tek's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.28x while Qorvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sono-Tek is 3.18x versus 1.74x for Qorvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.