NAII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mondelez International has a net margin of -6.43% compared to Natural Alternatives International's net margin of 18.17%. Natural Alternatives International's return on equity of -9.27% beat Mondelez International's return on equity of 16.53%.

Natural Alternatives International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mondelez International has an analysts' consensus of $70.86 which suggests that it could grow by 5.16%. Given that Mondelez International has higher upside potential than Natural Alternatives International, analysts believe Mondelez International is more attractive than Natural Alternatives International.

Natural Alternatives International has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.612% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International has a beta of 0.466, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.374%.

Natural Alternatives International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mondelez International offers a yield of 2.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Natural Alternatives International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International pays out 50.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Natural Alternatives International quarterly revenues are $34.1M, which are smaller than Mondelez International quarterly revenues of $9.6B. Natural Alternatives International's net income of -$2.2M is lower than Mondelez International's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Natural Alternatives International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mondelez International's PE ratio is 19.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Alternatives International is 0.13x versus 2.49x for Mondelez International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of -6.43% compared to Natural Alternatives International's net margin of --. Natural Alternatives International's return on equity of -9.27% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Natural Alternatives International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Natural Alternatives International has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Natural Alternatives International is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Natural Alternatives International has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.612% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of -0.324, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.446%.

Natural Alternatives International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natural Alternatives International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Natural Alternatives International quarterly revenues are $34.1M, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Natural Alternatives International's net income of -$2.2M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Natural Alternatives International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Alternatives International is 0.13x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of -6.43% compared to Natural Alternatives International's net margin of 3.36%. Natural Alternatives International's return on equity of -9.27% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Natural Alternatives International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $92.38 which suggests that it could grow by 52.08%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Natural Alternatives International, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Natural Alternatives International.

Natural Alternatives International has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.612% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.002%.

Natural Alternatives International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Natural Alternatives International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Natural Alternatives International quarterly revenues are $34.1M, which are smaller than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $700.2M. Natural Alternatives International's net income of -$2.2M is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M. Notably, Natural Alternatives International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 15.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Alternatives International is 0.13x versus 0.61x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Utz Brands has a net margin of -6.43% compared to Natural Alternatives International's net margin of 0.68%. Natural Alternatives International's return on equity of -9.27% beat Utz Brands's return on equity of 1.15%.

Natural Alternatives International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Utz Brands has an analysts' consensus of $17.55 which suggests that it could grow by 31.03%. Given that Utz Brands has higher upside potential than Natural Alternatives International, analysts believe Utz Brands is more attractive than Natural Alternatives International.

Natural Alternatives International has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.612% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Utz Brands has a beta of 1.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.602%.

Natural Alternatives International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Utz Brands offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Natural Alternatives International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Utz Brands pays out 136% of its earnings as a dividend.

Natural Alternatives International quarterly revenues are $34.1M, which are smaller than Utz Brands quarterly revenues of $341M. Natural Alternatives International's net income of -$2.2M is lower than Utz Brands's net income of $2.3M. Notably, Natural Alternatives International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Utz Brands's PE ratio is 74.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Alternatives International is 0.13x versus 0.80x for Utz Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.