UTZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lancaster Colony has a net margin of 0.68% compared to Utz Brands's net margin of 9.62%. Utz Brands's return on equity of 1.15% beat Lancaster Colony's return on equity of 16.79%.

Utz Brands has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.36%. On the other hand Lancaster Colony has an analysts' consensus of $205.20 which suggests that it could grow by 11.67%. Given that Utz Brands has higher upside potential than Lancaster Colony, analysts believe Utz Brands is more attractive than Lancaster Colony.

Utz Brands has a beta of 1.096, which suggesting that the stock is 9.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lancaster Colony has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.04%.

Utz Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Lancaster Colony offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share. Utz Brands pays 136% of its earnings as a dividend. Lancaster Colony pays out 61.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Lancaster Colony's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Utz Brands's is not.

Utz Brands quarterly revenues are $341M, which are smaller than Lancaster Colony quarterly revenues of $509.3M. Utz Brands's net income of $2.3M is lower than Lancaster Colony's net income of $49M. Notably, Utz Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.33x while Lancaster Colony's PE ratio is 32.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Utz Brands is 0.79x versus 2.66x for Lancaster Colony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mondelez International has a net margin of 0.68% compared to Utz Brands's net margin of 18.17%. Utz Brands's return on equity of 1.15% beat Mondelez International's return on equity of 16.53%.

Utz Brands has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.36%. On the other hand Mondelez International has an analysts' consensus of $69.30 which suggests that it could grow by 3.36%. Given that Utz Brands has higher upside potential than Mondelez International, analysts believe Utz Brands is more attractive than Mondelez International.

Utz Brands has a beta of 1.096, which suggesting that the stock is 9.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International has a beta of 0.466, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.374%.

Utz Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Mondelez International offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Utz Brands pays 136% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International pays out 50.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Utz Brands's is not.

Utz Brands quarterly revenues are $341M, which are smaller than Mondelez International quarterly revenues of $9.6B. Utz Brands's net income of $2.3M is lower than Mondelez International's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Utz Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.33x while Mondelez International's PE ratio is 19.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Utz Brands is 0.79x versus 2.48x for Mondelez International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Post Holdings has a net margin of 0.68% compared to Utz Brands's net margin of 5.74%. Utz Brands's return on equity of 1.15% beat Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.85%.

Utz Brands has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.36%. On the other hand Post Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $128.90 which suggests that it could grow by 10.24%. Given that Utz Brands has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe Utz Brands is more attractive than Post Holdings.

Utz Brands has a beta of 1.096, which suggesting that the stock is 9.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Post Holdings has a beta of 0.521, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.945%.

Utz Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Post Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Utz Brands pays 136% of its earnings as a dividend. Post Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Utz Brands quarterly revenues are $341M, which are smaller than Post Holdings quarterly revenues of $2B. Utz Brands's net income of $2.3M is lower than Post Holdings's net income of $113.3M. Notably, Utz Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.33x while Post Holdings's PE ratio is 19.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Utz Brands is 0.79x versus 0.98x for Post Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods has a net margin of 0.68% compared to Utz Brands's net margin of -0.04%. Utz Brands's return on equity of 1.15% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96%.

Utz Brands has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 36.36%. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.92%. Given that Utz Brands has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe Utz Brands is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

Utz Brands has a beta of 1.096, which suggesting that the stock is 9.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 1.078, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.767%.

Utz Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Utz Brands pays 136% of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Utz Brands quarterly revenues are $341M, which are smaller than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Utz Brands's net income of $2.3M is higher than United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M. Notably, Utz Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.33x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Utz Brands is 0.79x versus 0.05x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.