QMCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

IonQ has a net margin of -19.2% compared to Quantum's net margin of -1725%. Quantum's return on equity of -- beat IonQ's return on equity of -73.78%.

Quantum has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.21%. On the other hand IonQ has an analysts' consensus of $44.60 which suggests that it could grow by 108.7%. Given that IonQ has higher upside potential than Quantum, analysts believe IonQ is more attractive than Quantum.

Quantum has a beta of 3.070, which suggesting that the stock is 206.972% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IonQ has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Quantum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IonQ offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IonQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quantum quarterly revenues are $70.5M, which are larger than IonQ quarterly revenues of $11.7M. Quantum's net income of -$13.5M is higher than IonQ's net income of -$202M. Notably, Quantum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IonQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum is 0.25x versus 105.69x for IonQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NetApp has a net margin of -19.2% compared to Quantum's net margin of 18.22%. Quantum's return on equity of -- beat NetApp's return on equity of 114.71%.

Quantum has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.21%. On the other hand NetApp has an analysts' consensus of $121.38 which suggests that it could grow by 34.77%. Given that NetApp has higher upside potential than Quantum, analysts believe NetApp is more attractive than Quantum.

Quantum has a beta of 3.070, which suggesting that the stock is 206.972% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NetApp has a beta of 1.241, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.074%.

Quantum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NetApp offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Quantum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp pays out 42.19% of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quantum quarterly revenues are $70.5M, which are smaller than NetApp quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Quantum's net income of -$13.5M is lower than NetApp's net income of $299M. Notably, Quantum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NetApp's PE ratio is 16.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum is 0.25x versus 2.92x for NetApp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pure Storage has a net margin of -19.2% compared to Quantum's net margin of 4.82%. Quantum's return on equity of -- beat Pure Storage's return on equity of 7.83%.

Quantum has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.21%. On the other hand Pure Storage has an analysts' consensus of $71.52 which suggests that it could grow by 47.35%. Given that Pure Storage has higher upside potential than Quantum, analysts believe Pure Storage is more attractive than Quantum.

Quantum has a beta of 3.070, which suggesting that the stock is 206.972% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pure Storage has a beta of 1.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.236%.

Quantum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pure Storage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pure Storage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quantum quarterly revenues are $70.5M, which are smaller than Pure Storage quarterly revenues of $879.8M. Quantum's net income of -$13.5M is lower than Pure Storage's net income of $42.4M. Notably, Quantum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pure Storage's PE ratio is 161.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum is 0.25x versus 5.17x for Pure Storage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Digital has a net margin of -19.2% compared to Quantum's net margin of 13.86%. Quantum's return on equity of -- beat Western Digital's return on equity of 11.02%.

Quantum has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.21%. On the other hand Western Digital has an analysts' consensus of $75.83 which suggests that it could grow by 80.42%. Given that Western Digital has higher upside potential than Quantum, analysts believe Western Digital is more attractive than Quantum.

Quantum has a beta of 3.070, which suggesting that the stock is 206.972% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Digital has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.517%.

Quantum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Western Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Western Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quantum quarterly revenues are $70.5M, which are smaller than Western Digital quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Quantum's net income of -$13.5M is lower than Western Digital's net income of $594M. Notably, Quantum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Western Digital's PE ratio is 10.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum is 0.25x versus 0.93x for Western Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.