IONQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NVIDIA has a net margin of -1725% compared to IonQ's net margin of 56.17%. IonQ's return on equity of -73.78% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

IonQ has a consensus price target of $44.60, signalling upside risk potential of 104.4%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.36 which suggests that it could grow by 48.92%. Given that IonQ has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe IonQ is more attractive than NVIDIA.

IonQ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.581, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.058%.

IonQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. IonQ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IonQ quarterly revenues are $11.7M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. IonQ's net income of -$202M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, IonQ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 39.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IonQ is 107.91x versus 22.00x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quantum has a net margin of -1725% compared to IonQ's net margin of -19.2%. IonQ's return on equity of -73.78% beat Quantum's return on equity of --.

IonQ has a consensus price target of $44.60, signalling upside risk potential of 104.4%. On the other hand Quantum has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 68.74%. Given that IonQ has higher upside potential than Quantum, analysts believe IonQ is more attractive than Quantum.

IonQ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quantum has a beta of 3.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 206.972%.

IonQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quantum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IonQ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quantum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

IonQ quarterly revenues are $11.7M, which are smaller than Quantum quarterly revenues of $70.5M. IonQ's net income of -$202M is lower than Quantum's net income of -$13.5M. Notably, IonQ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quantum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IonQ is 107.91x versus 0.19x for Quantum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quantum Computing has a net margin of -1725% compared to IonQ's net margin of -5618.81%. IonQ's return on equity of -73.78% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity of -32.92%.

IonQ has a consensus price target of $44.60, signalling upside risk potential of 104.4%. On the other hand Quantum Computing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56.83%. Given that IonQ has higher upside potential than Quantum Computing, analysts believe IonQ is more attractive than Quantum Computing.

IonQ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 225.926%.

IonQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quantum Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IonQ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quantum Computing pays out -3.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

IonQ quarterly revenues are $11.7M, which are larger than Quantum Computing quarterly revenues of $101K. IonQ's net income of -$202M is lower than Quantum Computing's net income of -$5.7M. Notably, IonQ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quantum Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IonQ is 107.91x versus 1,201.38x for Quantum Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing has a net margin of -1725% compared to IonQ's net margin of -6726.52%. IonQ's return on equity of -73.78% beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity of -168.4%.

IonQ has a consensus price target of $44.60, signalling upside risk potential of 104.4%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 67.6%. Given that IonQ has higher upside potential than Rigetti Computing, analysts believe IonQ is more attractive than Rigetti Computing.

IonQ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

IonQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IonQ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

IonQ quarterly revenues are $11.7M, which are larger than Rigetti Computing quarterly revenues of $2.3M. IonQ's net income of -$202M is lower than Rigetti Computing's net income of -$153M. Notably, IonQ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rigetti Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IonQ is 107.91x versus 153.21x for Rigetti Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.