QUBT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Microsoft has a net margin of -5618.81% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 34.62%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of -32.92% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 54.83%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $506.75 which suggests that it could grow by 33.79%. Given that Quantum Computing has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Quantum Computing is more attractive than Microsoft.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.259, which suggesting that the stock is 225.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.215%.

Quantum Computing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Quantum Computing pays -3.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quantum Computing quarterly revenues are $101K, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. Quantum Computing's net income of -$5.7M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, Quantum Computing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 30.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing is 1,216.90x versus 10.81x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -5618.81% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 56.17%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of -32.92% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 54.83%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.50 which suggests that it could grow by 49.25%. Given that Quantum Computing has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Quantum Computing is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.259, which suggesting that the stock is 225.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.581, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.058%.

Quantum Computing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Quantum Computing pays -3.2% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quantum Computing quarterly revenues are $101K, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Quantum Computing's net income of -$5.7M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Quantum Computing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 39.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing is 1,216.90x versus 21.97x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

D-Wave Quantum has a net margin of -5618.81% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of -1214.55%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of -32.92% beat D-Wave Quantum's return on equity of --.

Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 54.83%. On the other hand D-Wave Quantum has an analysts' consensus of $9.25 which suggests that it could grow by 31.45%. Given that Quantum Computing has higher upside potential than D-Wave Quantum, analysts believe Quantum Computing is more attractive than D-Wave Quantum.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.259, which suggesting that the stock is 225.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison D-Wave Quantum has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Quantum Computing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. D-Wave Quantum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum Computing pays -3.2% of its earnings as a dividend. D-Wave Quantum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quantum Computing quarterly revenues are $101K, which are smaller than D-Wave Quantum quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Quantum Computing's net income of -$5.7M is higher than D-Wave Quantum's net income of -$22.7M. Notably, Quantum Computing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while D-Wave Quantum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing is 1,216.90x versus 127.01x for D-Wave Quantum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing has a net margin of -5618.81% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of -6726.52%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of -32.92% beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity of -168.4%.

Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 54.83%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 71.43%. Given that Rigetti Computing has higher upside potential than Quantum Computing, analysts believe Rigetti Computing is more attractive than Quantum Computing.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.259, which suggesting that the stock is 225.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Quantum Computing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum Computing pays -3.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quantum Computing quarterly revenues are $101K, which are smaller than Rigetti Computing quarterly revenues of $2.3M. Quantum Computing's net income of -$5.7M is higher than Rigetti Computing's net income of -$153M. Notably, Quantum Computing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rigetti Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing is 1,216.90x versus 149.78x for Rigetti Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.