RICK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flanigan'S Enterprises has a net margin of 0.33% compared to RCI Hospitality Holdings's net margin of 0.4%. RCI Hospitality Holdings's return on equity of 1.09% beat Flanigan'S Enterprises's return on equity of 4.46%.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 70.02%. On the other hand Flanigan'S Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RCI Hospitality Holdings has higher upside potential than Flanigan'S Enterprises, analysts believe RCI Hospitality Holdings is more attractive than Flanigan'S Enterprises.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.067% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flanigan'S Enterprises has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.806%.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Flanigan'S Enterprises offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. RCI Hospitality Holdings pays 76.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan'S Enterprises pays out 27.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RCI Hospitality Holdings quarterly revenues are $73.2M, which are larger than Flanigan'S Enterprises quarterly revenues of $46M. RCI Hospitality Holdings's net income of $244K is higher than Flanigan'S Enterprises's net income of $184K. Notably, RCI Hospitality Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 180.13x while Flanigan'S Enterprises's PE ratio is 13.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RCI Hospitality Holdings is 1.80x versus 0.25x for Flanigan'S Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 0.33% compared to RCI Hospitality Holdings's net margin of 7.44%. RCI Hospitality Holdings's return on equity of 1.09% beat Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.85%.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 70.02%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $195.79 which suggests that it could grow by 6.21%. Given that RCI Hospitality Holdings has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe RCI Hospitality Holdings is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.067% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.638%.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Darden Restaurants offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. RCI Hospitality Holdings pays 76.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RCI Hospitality Holdings quarterly revenues are $73.2M, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues of $2.9B. RCI Hospitality Holdings's net income of $244K is lower than Darden Restaurants's net income of $215.1M. Notably, RCI Hospitality Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 180.13x while Darden Restaurants's PE ratio is 21.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RCI Hospitality Holdings is 1.80x versus 1.90x for Darden Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Starbucks has a net margin of 0.33% compared to RCI Hospitality Holdings's net margin of 10.02%. RCI Hospitality Holdings's return on equity of 1.09% beat Starbucks's return on equity of --.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 70.02%. On the other hand Starbucks has an analysts' consensus of $103.30 which suggests that it could grow by 10.93%. Given that RCI Hospitality Holdings has higher upside potential than Starbucks, analysts believe RCI Hospitality Holdings is more attractive than Starbucks.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.067% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starbucks has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.1%.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Starbucks offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. RCI Hospitality Holdings pays 76.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks pays out 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RCI Hospitality Holdings quarterly revenues are $73.2M, which are smaller than Starbucks quarterly revenues of $9.1B. RCI Hospitality Holdings's net income of $244K is lower than Starbucks's net income of $909.2M. Notably, RCI Hospitality Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 180.13x while Starbucks's PE ratio is 28.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RCI Hospitality Holdings is 1.80x versus 2.93x for Starbucks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Notes Live Holding has a net margin of 0.33% compared to RCI Hospitality Holdings's net margin of --. RCI Hospitality Holdings's return on equity of 1.09% beat Notes Live Holding's return on equity of --.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 70.02%. On the other hand Notes Live Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RCI Hospitality Holdings has higher upside potential than Notes Live Holding, analysts believe RCI Hospitality Holdings is more attractive than Notes Live Holding.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.067% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Notes Live Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

RCI Hospitality Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Notes Live Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RCI Hospitality Holdings pays 76.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Notes Live Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. RCI Hospitality Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RCI Hospitality Holdings quarterly revenues are $73.2M, which are larger than Notes Live Holding quarterly revenues of --. RCI Hospitality Holdings's net income of $244K is higher than Notes Live Holding's net income of --. Notably, RCI Hospitality Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 180.13x while Notes Live Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RCI Hospitality Holdings is 1.80x versus -- for Notes Live Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.