DRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dine Brands Global has a net margin of 7.44% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 2.53%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.85% beat Dine Brands Global's return on equity of --.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $199.48, signalling upside risk potential of 6.02%. On the other hand Dine Brands Global has an analysts' consensus of $29.86 which suggests that it could grow by 19.38%. Given that Dine Brands Global has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Dine Brands Global is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.273, which suggesting that the stock is 27.282% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.851, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.103%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Dine Brands Global offers a yield of 8.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Dine Brands Global pays out 48.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues of $204.8M. Darden Restaurants's net income of $215.1M is higher than Dine Brands Global's net income of $5.2M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.55x while Dine Brands Global's PE ratio is 5.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 1.94x versus 0.46x for Dine Brands Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 7.44% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 8.73%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.85% beat Brinker International's return on equity of 4799.27%.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $199.48, signalling upside risk potential of 6.02%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $183.06 which suggests that it could grow by 29.46%. Given that Brinker International has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Brinker International is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.273, which suggesting that the stock is 27.282% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.563, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 156.326%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Darden Restaurants's net income of $215.1M is higher than Brinker International's net income of $118.5M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.55x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 24.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 1.94x versus 1.35x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse has a net margin of 7.44% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 8.06%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.85% beat Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 34.11%.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $199.48, signalling upside risk potential of 6.02%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse has an analysts' consensus of $191.20 which suggests that it could grow by 12.44%. Given that Texas Roadhouse has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Texas Roadhouse is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.273, which suggesting that the stock is 27.282% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.0029999999999974%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Texas Roadhouse offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse pays out 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Darden Restaurants's net income of $215.1M is higher than Texas Roadhouse's net income of $115.8M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.55x while Texas Roadhouse's PE ratio is 26.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 1.94x versus 2.12x for Texas Roadhouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wingstop has a net margin of 7.44% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 16.53%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.85% beat Wingstop's return on equity of --.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $199.48, signalling upside risk potential of 6.02%. On the other hand Wingstop has an analysts' consensus of $322.74 which suggests that it could grow by 50.7%. Given that Wingstop has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Wingstop is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.273, which suggesting that the stock is 27.282% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wingstop has a beta of 1.878, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.824%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.93%. Wingstop offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop pays out 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Wingstop quarterly revenues of $161.8M. Darden Restaurants's net income of $215.1M is higher than Wingstop's net income of $26.8M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.55x while Wingstop's PE ratio is 57.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 1.94x versus 10.06x for Wingstop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.