SMID Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 13.36% compared to Smith-Midland's net margin of -0.63%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 18% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

Smith-Midland has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smith-Midland has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Smith-Midland is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.735% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.118%.

Smith-Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Smith-Midland pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith-Midland quarterly revenues are $23.6M, which are smaller than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Smith-Midland's net income of $3.2M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Smith-Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.74x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 13.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith-Midland is 3.10x versus 0.23x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 13.36% compared to Smith-Midland's net margin of 1.61%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 18% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2%.

Smith-Midland has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.27%. Given that Kaiser Aluminum has higher upside potential than Smith-Midland, analysts believe Kaiser Aluminum is more attractive than Smith-Midland.

Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.735% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.032%.

Smith-Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Smith-Midland pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

Smith-Midland quarterly revenues are $23.6M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $747.7M. Smith-Midland's net income of $3.2M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M. Notably, Smith-Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.74x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 24.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith-Midland is 3.10x versus 0.38x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 13.36% compared to Smith-Midland's net margin of --. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 18% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Smith-Midland has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 250.88%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Smith-Midland, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Smith-Midland.

Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.735% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

Smith-Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith-Midland pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Smith-Midland quarterly revenues are $23.6M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Smith-Midland's net income of $3.2M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Smith-Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.74x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith-Midland is 3.10x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 13.36% compared to Smith-Midland's net margin of --. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 18% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Smith-Midland has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 152.31%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Smith-Midland, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Smith-Midland.

Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.735% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.984%.

Smith-Midland has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith-Midland pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Smith-Midland quarterly revenues are $23.6M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Smith-Midland's net income of $3.2M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Smith-Midland's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.74x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith-Midland is 3.10x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.