SMPL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BellRing Brands has a net margin of 10.22% compared to The Simply Good Foods's net margin of 14.43%. The Simply Good Foods's return on equity of 8.4% beat BellRing Brands's return on equity of --.

The Simply Good Foods has a consensus price target of $41.42, signalling upside risk potential of 14.44%. On the other hand BellRing Brands has an analysts' consensus of $85.63 which suggests that it could grow by 15.82%. Given that BellRing Brands has higher upside potential than The Simply Good Foods, analysts believe BellRing Brands is more attractive than The Simply Good Foods.

The Simply Good Foods has a beta of 0.631, which suggesting that the stock is 36.91% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BellRing Brands has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The Simply Good Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BellRing Brands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Simply Good Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BellRing Brands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Simply Good Foods quarterly revenues are $359.7M, which are smaller than BellRing Brands quarterly revenues of $532.9M. The Simply Good Foods's net income of $36.7M is lower than BellRing Brands's net income of $76.9M. Notably, The Simply Good Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.13x while BellRing Brands's PE ratio is 34.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Simply Good Foods is 2.60x versus 4.64x for BellRing Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

J&J Snack Foods has a net margin of 10.22% compared to The Simply Good Foods's net margin of 1.42%. The Simply Good Foods's return on equity of 8.4% beat J&J Snack Foods's return on equity of 9.04%.

The Simply Good Foods has a consensus price target of $41.42, signalling upside risk potential of 14.44%. On the other hand J&J Snack Foods has an analysts' consensus of $160.25 which suggests that it could grow by 17.82%. Given that J&J Snack Foods has higher upside potential than The Simply Good Foods, analysts believe J&J Snack Foods is more attractive than The Simply Good Foods.

The Simply Good Foods has a beta of 0.631, which suggesting that the stock is 36.91% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison J&J Snack Foods has a beta of 0.485, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.541%.

The Simply Good Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. J&J Snack Foods offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. The Simply Good Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. J&J Snack Foods pays out 65.81% of its earnings as a dividend. J&J Snack Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Simply Good Foods quarterly revenues are $359.7M, which are smaller than J&J Snack Foods quarterly revenues of $362.6M. The Simply Good Foods's net income of $36.7M is higher than J&J Snack Foods's net income of $5.1M. Notably, The Simply Good Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.13x while J&J Snack Foods's PE ratio is 31.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Simply Good Foods is 2.60x versus 1.67x for J&J Snack Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 10.22% compared to The Simply Good Foods's net margin of 32.41%. The Simply Good Foods's return on equity of 8.4% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.57%.

The Simply Good Foods has a consensus price target of $41.42, signalling upside risk potential of 14.44%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $32.57 which suggests that it could grow by 8.23%. Given that The Simply Good Foods has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz, analysts believe The Simply Good Foods is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz.

The Simply Good Foods has a beta of 0.631, which suggesting that the stock is 36.91% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.444, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.572%.

The Simply Good Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. The Simply Good Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Simply Good Foods quarterly revenues are $359.7M, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6.6B. The Simply Good Foods's net income of $36.7M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $2.1B. Notably, The Simply Good Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.13x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 13.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Simply Good Foods is 2.60x versus 1.42x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Post Holdings has a net margin of 10.22% compared to The Simply Good Foods's net margin of 5.74%. The Simply Good Foods's return on equity of 8.4% beat Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.85%.

The Simply Good Foods has a consensus price target of $41.42, signalling upside risk potential of 14.44%. On the other hand Post Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $128.90 which suggests that it could grow by 11.58%. Given that The Simply Good Foods has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe The Simply Good Foods is more attractive than Post Holdings.

The Simply Good Foods has a beta of 0.631, which suggesting that the stock is 36.91% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Post Holdings has a beta of 0.521, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.945%.

The Simply Good Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Post Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Simply Good Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Post Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Simply Good Foods quarterly revenues are $359.7M, which are smaller than Post Holdings quarterly revenues of $2B. The Simply Good Foods's net income of $36.7M is lower than Post Holdings's net income of $113.3M. Notably, The Simply Good Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.13x while Post Holdings's PE ratio is 19.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Simply Good Foods is 2.60x versus 0.97x for Post Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.