POST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BellRing Brands has a net margin of 4.06% compared to Post Holdings's net margin of 12.9%. Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.24% beat BellRing Brands's return on equity of --.

Post Holdings has a consensus price target of $126.80, signalling upside risk potential of 10.7%. On the other hand BellRing Brands has an analysts' consensus of $82.93 which suggests that it could grow by 8.92%. Given that Post Holdings has higher upside potential than BellRing Brands, analysts believe Post Holdings is more attractive than BellRing Brands.

Post Holdings has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BellRing Brands has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Post Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BellRing Brands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Post Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BellRing Brands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Post Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than BellRing Brands quarterly revenues of $555.8M. Post Holdings's net income of $81.6M is higher than BellRing Brands's net income of $71.7M. Notably, Post Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.31x while BellRing Brands's PE ratio is 40.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings is 0.97x versus 5.05x for BellRing Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Better Choice has a net margin of 4.06% compared to Post Holdings's net margin of 13.42%. Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.24% beat Better Choice's return on equity of -199.75%.

Post Holdings has a consensus price target of $126.80, signalling upside risk potential of 10.7%. On the other hand Better Choice has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 362.96%. Given that Better Choice has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe Better Choice is more attractive than Post Holdings.

Post Holdings has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Better Choice has a beta of 0.729, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.081%.

Post Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Better Choice offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Post Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Better Choice pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Post Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Better Choice quarterly revenues of $11.4M. Post Holdings's net income of $81.6M is higher than Better Choice's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Post Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.31x while Better Choice's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings is 0.97x versus 0.07x for Better Choice. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 4.06% compared to Post Holdings's net margin of -4.54%. Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.24% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 2.78%.

Post Holdings has a consensus price target of $126.80, signalling upside risk potential of 10.7%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $38.10 which suggests that it could grow by 25.07%. Given that The Kraft Heinz has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz is more attractive than Post Holdings.

Post Holdings has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.479, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.124%.

Post Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Post Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 68.83% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Post Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Post Holdings's net income of $81.6M is higher than The Kraft Heinz's net income of -$290M. Notably, Post Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.31x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 27.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings is 0.97x versus 1.43x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood has a net margin of 4.06% compared to Post Holdings's net margin of -1.41%. Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.24% beat Laird Superfood's return on equity of -9.88%.

Post Holdings has a consensus price target of $126.80, signalling upside risk potential of 10.7%. On the other hand Laird Superfood has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 66.88%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Post Holdings.

Post Holdings has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.585% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Post Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laird Superfood offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Post Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Post Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Laird Superfood quarterly revenues of $11.8M. Post Holdings's net income of $81.6M is higher than Laird Superfood's net income of -$166.1K. Notably, Post Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.31x while Laird Superfood's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings is 0.97x versus 1.85x for Laird Superfood. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.