TER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of 19.43% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 16.78%. Teradyne's return on equity of 20.03% beat Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 21.52%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $119.31, signalling upside risk potential of 39.83%. On the other hand Frequency Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Teradyne has higher upside potential than Frequency Electronics, analysts believe Teradyne is more attractive than Frequency Electronics.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.460, which suggesting that the stock is 45.999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.414, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.621%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. Frequency Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Teradyne pays 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Frequency Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $752.9M, which are larger than Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues of $15.8M. Teradyne's net income of $146.3M is higher than Frequency Electronics's net income of $2.7M. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.62x while Frequency Electronics's PE ratio is 17.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 4.94x versus 2.22x for Frequency Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Itron has a net margin of 19.43% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 9.48%. Teradyne's return on equity of 20.03% beat Itron's return on equity of 17.69%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $119.31, signalling upside risk potential of 39.83%. On the other hand Itron has an analysts' consensus of $129.38 which suggests that it could grow by 24.52%. Given that Teradyne has higher upside potential than Itron, analysts believe Teradyne is more attractive than Itron.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.460, which suggesting that the stock is 45.999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itron has a beta of 1.487, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.656%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. Itron offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Teradyne pays 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Itron pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $752.9M, which are larger than Itron quarterly revenues of $612.9M. Teradyne's net income of $146.3M is higher than Itron's net income of $58.1M. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.62x while Itron's PE ratio is 20.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 4.94x versus 1.97x for Itron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MKS Instruments has a net margin of 19.43% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 9.74%. Teradyne's return on equity of 20.03% beat MKS Instruments's return on equity of 8.06%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $119.31, signalling upside risk potential of 39.83%. On the other hand MKS Instruments has an analysts' consensus of $133.72 which suggests that it could grow by 64.6%. Given that MKS Instruments has higher upside potential than Teradyne, analysts believe MKS Instruments is more attractive than Teradyne.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.460, which suggesting that the stock is 45.999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MKS Instruments has a beta of 1.756, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.592%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. MKS Instruments offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Teradyne pays 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. MKS Instruments pays out 31.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $752.9M, which are smaller than MKS Instruments quarterly revenues of $934M. Teradyne's net income of $146.3M is higher than MKS Instruments's net income of $91M. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.62x while MKS Instruments's PE ratio is 29.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 4.94x versus 1.53x for MKS Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Digital has a net margin of 19.43% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 13.86%. Teradyne's return on equity of 20.03% beat Western Digital's return on equity of 11.02%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $119.31, signalling upside risk potential of 39.83%. On the other hand Western Digital has an analysts' consensus of $75.83 which suggests that it could grow by 80.42%. Given that Western Digital has higher upside potential than Teradyne, analysts believe Western Digital is more attractive than Teradyne.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.460, which suggesting that the stock is 45.999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Digital has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.517%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.56%. Western Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Teradyne pays 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Western Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $752.9M, which are smaller than Western Digital quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Teradyne's net income of $146.3M is lower than Western Digital's net income of $594M. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.62x while Western Digital's PE ratio is 10.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 4.94x versus 0.93x for Western Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.