TPCS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Janus International Group has a net margin of -18.28% compared to Techprecision's net margin of 5.13%. Techprecision's return on equity of -71.07% beat Janus International Group's return on equity of 20.21%.

Techprecision has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Janus International Group has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.89%. Given that Janus International Group has higher upside potential than Techprecision, analysts believe Janus International Group is more attractive than Techprecision.

Techprecision has a beta of 0.187, which suggesting that the stock is 81.268% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Janus International Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Techprecision has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Janus International Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Techprecision pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Janus International Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Techprecision quarterly revenues are $8M, which are smaller than Janus International Group quarterly revenues of $230.1M. Techprecision's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Janus International Group's net income of $11.8M. Notably, Techprecision's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Janus International Group's PE ratio is 10.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Techprecision is 0.95x versus 1.11x for Janus International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mestek has a net margin of -18.28% compared to Techprecision's net margin of --. Techprecision's return on equity of -71.07% beat Mestek's return on equity of --.

Techprecision has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mestek has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Techprecision has higher upside potential than Mestek, analysts believe Techprecision is more attractive than Mestek.

Techprecision has a beta of 0.187, which suggesting that the stock is 81.268% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mestek has a beta of 0.512, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.847%.

Techprecision has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mestek offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Techprecision pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mestek pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Techprecision quarterly revenues are $8M, which are larger than Mestek quarterly revenues of --. Techprecision's net income of -$1.5M is higher than Mestek's net income of --. Notably, Techprecision's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mestek's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Techprecision is 0.95x versus 0.61x for Mestek. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanex Building Products has a net margin of -18.28% compared to Techprecision's net margin of -2.83%. Techprecision's return on equity of -71.07% beat Quanex Building Products's return on equity of 5.05%.

Techprecision has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quanex Building Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 54.54%. Given that Quanex Building Products has higher upside potential than Techprecision, analysts believe Quanex Building Products is more attractive than Techprecision.

Techprecision has a beta of 0.187, which suggesting that the stock is 81.268% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanex Building Products has a beta of 1.296, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.61%.

Techprecision has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quanex Building Products offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Techprecision pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products pays out 36.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Techprecision quarterly revenues are $8M, which are smaller than Quanex Building Products quarterly revenues of $492.2M. Techprecision's net income of -$1.5M is higher than Quanex Building Products's net income of -$13.9M. Notably, Techprecision's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quanex Building Products's PE ratio is 20.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Techprecision is 0.95x versus 0.67x for Quanex Building Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Holdings has a net margin of -18.28% compared to Techprecision's net margin of -211.96%. Techprecision's return on equity of -71.07% beat Safe & Green Holdings's return on equity of -886.67%.

Techprecision has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Safe & Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31095.84%. Given that Safe & Green Holdings has higher upside potential than Techprecision, analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings is more attractive than Techprecision.

Techprecision has a beta of 0.187, which suggesting that the stock is 81.268% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Holdings has a beta of -2.682, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 368.188%.

Techprecision has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safe & Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Techprecision pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Techprecision quarterly revenues are $8M, which are larger than Safe & Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.8M. Techprecision's net income of -$1.5M is higher than Safe & Green Holdings's net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Techprecision's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Safe & Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Techprecision is 0.95x versus 0.11x for Safe & Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.