TRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cintas has a net margin of 30.75% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of 17.76%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 19.19% beat Cintas's return on equity of 41.44%.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $176.92, signalling downside risk potential of -2.93%. On the other hand Cintas has an analysts' consensus of $209.54 which suggests that it could grow by 1.8%. Given that Cintas has higher upside potential than Thomson Reuters, analysts believe Cintas is more attractive than Thomson Reuters.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.712, which suggesting that the stock is 28.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cintas has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.05%.

Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Cintas offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 42.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas pays out 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Cintas quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Thomson Reuters's net income of $587M is higher than Cintas's net income of $463.5M. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.27x while Cintas's PE ratio is 47.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 11.33x versus 8.35x for Cintas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enviro Serv has a net margin of 30.75% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of --. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 19.19% beat Enviro Serv's return on equity of --.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $176.92, signalling downside risk potential of -2.93%. On the other hand Enviro Serv has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters has higher upside potential than Enviro Serv, analysts believe Thomson Reuters is more attractive than Enviro Serv.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.712, which suggesting that the stock is 28.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enviro Serv has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.337%.

Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Enviro Serv offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 42.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Enviro Serv pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thomson Reuters's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Enviro Serv quarterly revenues of --. Thomson Reuters's net income of $587M is higher than Enviro Serv's net income of --. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.27x while Enviro Serv's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 11.33x versus -- for Enviro Serv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resources Connection has a net margin of 30.75% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of -34.03%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 19.19% beat Resources Connection's return on equity of -29.28%.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $176.92, signalling downside risk potential of -2.93%. On the other hand Resources Connection has an analysts' consensus of $9.67 which suggests that it could grow by 77.05%. Given that Resources Connection has higher upside potential than Thomson Reuters, analysts believe Resources Connection is more attractive than Thomson Reuters.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.712, which suggesting that the stock is 28.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Connection has a beta of 0.603, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.728%.

Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Resources Connection offers a yield of 10.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 42.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection pays out 89.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Resources Connection quarterly revenues of $129.4M. Thomson Reuters's net income of $587M is higher than Resources Connection's net income of -$44.1M. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.27x while Resources Connection's PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 11.33x versus 0.32x for Resources Connection. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPAR Group has a net margin of 30.75% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of -0.38%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 19.19% beat SPAR Group's return on equity of 33.96%.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $176.92, signalling downside risk potential of -2.93%. On the other hand SPAR Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 530.63%. Given that SPAR Group has higher upside potential than Thomson Reuters, analysts believe SPAR Group is more attractive than Thomson Reuters.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.712, which suggesting that the stock is 28.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPAR Group has a beta of 0.470, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53%.

Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. SPAR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 42.94% of its earnings as a dividend. SPAR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thomson Reuters's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than SPAR Group quarterly revenues of $37.8M. Thomson Reuters's net income of $587M is higher than SPAR Group's net income of -$144K. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.27x while SPAR Group's PE ratio is 2.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 11.33x versus 0.12x for SPAR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.