CTAS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lightbridge has a net margin of 17.76% compared to Cintas's net margin of --. Cintas's return on equity of 41.44% beat Lightbridge's return on equity of --.

Cintas has a consensus price target of $206.34, signalling downside risk potential of -0.74%. On the other hand Lightbridge has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1595.83%. Given that Lightbridge has higher upside potential than Cintas, analysts believe Lightbridge is more attractive than Cintas.

Cintas has a beta of 1.201, which suggesting that the stock is 20.05% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lightbridge has a beta of 2.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.469%.

Cintas has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Lightbridge offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cintas pays 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Lightbridge pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cintas quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Lightbridge quarterly revenues of --. Cintas's net income of $463.5M is higher than Lightbridge's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Cintas's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.15x while Lightbridge's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cintas is 8.43x versus 613.51x for Lightbridge. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resources Connection has a net margin of 17.76% compared to Cintas's net margin of -47.19%. Cintas's return on equity of 41.44% beat Resources Connection's return on equity of -15.5%.

Cintas has a consensus price target of $206.34, signalling downside risk potential of -0.74%. On the other hand Resources Connection has an analysts' consensus of $11.17 which suggests that it could grow by 67.92%. Given that Resources Connection has higher upside potential than Cintas, analysts believe Resources Connection is more attractive than Cintas.

Cintas has a beta of 1.201, which suggesting that the stock is 20.05% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Connection has a beta of 0.603, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.728%.

Cintas has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Resources Connection offers a yield of 8.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Cintas pays 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection pays out 89.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cintas quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Resources Connection quarterly revenues of $145.6M. Cintas's net income of $463.5M is higher than Resources Connection's net income of -$68.7M. Notably, Cintas's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.15x while Resources Connection's PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cintas is 8.43x versus 0.38x for Resources Connection. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPAR Group has a net margin of 17.76% compared to Cintas's net margin of -0.38%. Cintas's return on equity of 41.44% beat SPAR Group's return on equity of 33.96%.

Cintas has a consensus price target of $206.34, signalling downside risk potential of -0.74%. On the other hand SPAR Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 438.46%. Given that SPAR Group has higher upside potential than Cintas, analysts believe SPAR Group is more attractive than Cintas.

Cintas has a beta of 1.201, which suggesting that the stock is 20.05% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPAR Group has a beta of 0.470, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53%.

Cintas has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. SPAR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cintas pays 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. SPAR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cintas quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than SPAR Group quarterly revenues of $37.8M. Cintas's net income of $463.5M is higher than SPAR Group's net income of -$144K. Notably, Cintas's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.15x while SPAR Group's PE ratio is 2.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cintas is 8.43x versus 0.14x for SPAR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verisk Analytics has a net margin of 17.76% compared to Cintas's net margin of 28.59%. Cintas's return on equity of 41.44% beat Verisk Analytics's return on equity of 329.21%.

Cintas has a consensus price target of $206.34, signalling downside risk potential of -0.74%. On the other hand Verisk Analytics has an analysts' consensus of $294.52 which suggests that it could fall by -1.37%. Given that Verisk Analytics has more downside risk than Cintas, analysts believe Cintas is more attractive than Verisk Analytics.

Cintas has a beta of 1.201, which suggesting that the stock is 20.05% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.877, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.256%.

Cintas has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Verisk Analytics offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Cintas pays 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Verisk Analytics pays out 23.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cintas quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Verisk Analytics quarterly revenues of $735.6M. Cintas's net income of $463.5M is higher than Verisk Analytics's net income of $210.3M. Notably, Cintas's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.15x while Verisk Analytics's PE ratio is 44.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cintas is 8.43x versus 14.80x for Verisk Analytics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.