TSLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of 8.61% compared to Tesla's net margin of 6.27%. Tesla's return on equity of 19.77% beat General Motors's return on equity of 15.22%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $295.52, signalling downside risk potential of -25.17%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $59.21 which suggests that it could grow by 16.09%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.301, which suggesting that the stock is 130.123% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.376%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 5.9% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $25.2B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $48.8B. Tesla's net income of $2.2B is lower than General Motors's net income of $3.1B. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 108.20x while General Motors's PE ratio is 5.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 14.19x versus 0.33x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of 8.61% compared to Tesla's net margin of -496.14%. Tesla's return on equity of 19.77% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -71.79%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $295.52, signalling downside risk potential of -25.17%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could fall by -7.82%. Given that Tesla has more downside risk than Lucid Group, analysts believe Lucid Group is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.301, which suggesting that the stock is 130.123% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $25.2B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $200M. Tesla's net income of $2.2B is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$992.5M. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 108.20x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 14.19x versus 9.41x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 8.61% compared to Tesla's net margin of -125.86%. Tesla's return on equity of 19.77% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -68.23%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $295.52, signalling downside risk potential of -25.17%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.92 which suggests that it could grow by 5.01%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.301, which suggesting that the stock is 130.123% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $25.2B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $874M. Tesla's net income of $2.2B is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 108.20x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 14.19x versus 3.09x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winnebago Industries has a net margin of 8.61% compared to Tesla's net margin of -0.83%. Tesla's return on equity of 19.77% beat Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -1.38%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $295.52, signalling downside risk potential of -25.17%. On the other hand Winnebago Industries has an analysts' consensus of $62.92 which suggests that it could grow by 29.81%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.301, which suggesting that the stock is 130.123% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.624, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.435%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Winnebago Industries offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winnebago Industries pays out 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $25.2B, which are larger than Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues of $625.6M. Tesla's net income of $2.2B is higher than Winnebago Industries's net income of -$5.2M. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 108.20x while Winnebago Industries's PE ratio is 196.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 14.19x versus 0.50x for Winnebago Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.