F Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of 3.78% compared to Ford Motor's net margin of -6.21%. Ford Motor's return on equity of 13.45% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.57%.

Ford Motor has a consensus price target of $10.45, signalling upside risk potential of 5.53%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $61.40 which suggests that it could grow by 30.09%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Ford Motor has a beta of 1.591, which suggesting that the stock is 59.114% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.426, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.563%.

Ford Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.58%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Ford Motor pays 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ford Motor quarterly revenues are $48.2B, which are larger than General Motors quarterly revenues of $47.7B. Ford Motor's net income of $1.8B is higher than General Motors's net income of -$3B. Notably, Ford Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.78x while General Motors's PE ratio is 7.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ford Motor is 0.22x versus 0.28x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of 3.78% compared to Ford Motor's net margin of -169.41%. Ford Motor's return on equity of 13.45% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -70.84%.

Ford Motor has a consensus price target of $10.45, signalling upside risk potential of 5.53%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.43 which suggests that it could grow by 0.21%. Given that Ford Motor has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Ford Motor is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Ford Motor has a beta of 1.591, which suggesting that the stock is 59.114% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ford Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.58%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ford Motor pays 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ford Motor quarterly revenues are $48.2B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $234.5M. Ford Motor's net income of $1.8B is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$397.2M. Notably, Ford Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.78x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ford Motor is 0.22x versus 7.32x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 3.78% compared to Ford Motor's net margin of -42.85%. Ford Motor's return on equity of 13.45% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

Ford Motor has a consensus price target of $10.45, signalling upside risk potential of 5.53%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 12.65%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Ford Motor has a beta of 1.591, which suggesting that the stock is 59.114% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ford Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.58%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ford Motor pays 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ford Motor quarterly revenues are $48.2B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Ford Motor's net income of $1.8B is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, Ford Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.78x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ford Motor is 0.22x versus 2.65x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 3.78% compared to Ford Motor's net margin of 9.17%. Ford Motor's return on equity of 13.45% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Ford Motor has a consensus price target of $10.45, signalling upside risk potential of 5.53%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $330.38 which suggests that it could grow by 21.63%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Ford Motor has a beta of 1.591, which suggesting that the stock is 59.114% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.394%.

Ford Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.58%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ford Motor pays 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ford Motor quarterly revenues are $48.2B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Ford Motor's net income of $1.8B is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Ford Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.78x while Tesla's PE ratio is 133.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ford Motor is 0.22x versus 9.78x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.