Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
39
UFCS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.87
Seasonality move
:
3.15%
Day range:
$28.58 - $29.90
52-week range:
$18.04 - $31.70
Dividend yield:
2.21%
P/E ratio:
14.92x
P/S ratio:
0.61x
P/B ratio:
0.93x
Volume:
416.8K
Avg. volume:
156K
1-year change:
43.32%
Market cap:
$733.7M
Revenue:
$1.1B
EPS (TTM):
$1.94
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UFCS
United Fire Group
|
$306.8M | $0.21 | 12.93% | -14.29% | -- |
|
ACIC
American Coastal Insurance
|
$84.5M | $0.35 | -4.66% | -48.39% | -- |
|
ALL
Allstate
|
$15.7B | $2.40 | 7.73% | 3.28% | $223.18 |
|
MCY
Mercury General
|
$1.4B | $1.15 | 1.86% | -43.93% | -- |
|
SAFT
Safety Insurance Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TRV
The Travelers Companies
|
$10.6B | $3.59 | -1.31% | -6.53% | $264.72 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UFCS
United Fire Group
|
$28.95 | -- | $733.7M | 14.92x | $0.16 | 2.21% | 0.61x |
|
ACIC
American Coastal Insurance
|
$13.13 | -- | $632.9M | 7.50x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.14x |
|
ALL
Allstate
|
$193.56 | $223.18 | $51.3B | 12.54x | $0.92 | 1.9% | 0.82x |
|
MCY
Mercury General
|
$68.19 | -- | $3.8B | 6.76x | $0.32 | 1.86% | 0.69x |
|
SAFT
Safety Insurance Group
|
$82.12 | -- | $1.2B | 16.26x | $0.90 | 4.38% | 1.12x |
|
TRV
The Travelers Companies
|
$240.76 | $264.72 | $54.7B | 12.35x | $1.05 | 1.72% | 1.23x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UFCS
United Fire Group
|
12.96% | 2.100 | 22.06% | -- |
|
ACIC
American Coastal Insurance
|
36.46% | 0.940 | 27.41% | 2.50x |
|
ALL
Allstate
|
27.91% | 0.532 | 15.49% | -- |
|
MCY
Mercury General
|
23.56% | 0.921 | 16.46% | 3.76x |
|
SAFT
Safety Insurance Group
|
3.4% | 0.365 | 2.47% | 7.94x |
|
TRV
The Travelers Companies
|
22.48% | 0.789 | 15.11% | 26.06x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UFCS
United Fire Group
|
-- | -- | 6.25% | 6.91% | 8.5% | $53.4M |
|
ACIC
American Coastal Insurance
|
-- | -- | 24.73% | 43.57% | 48.19% | -$9M |
|
ALL
Allstate
|
-- | -- | 16.27% | 23.5% | 9.15% | $3.1B |
|
MCY
Mercury General
|
-- | -- | 25.59% | 34.73% | 19.26% | $306.2M |
|
SAFT
Safety Insurance Group
|
-- | -- | 8.93% | 9.26% | 11.35% | $73.2M |
|
TRV
The Travelers Companies
|
-- | -- | 13.97% | 18.55% | 13.93% | $3.9B |
United Fire Group vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns UFCS or ACIC?
American Coastal Insurance has a net margin of 6.12% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 34.24%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 6.91% beat American Coastal Insurance's return on equity of 43.57%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UFCSUnited Fire Group-- $0.76 $902.8M ACICAmerican Coastal Insurance-- $0.57 $408.5M -
What do Analysts Say About UFCS or ACIC?
United Fire Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -10.19%. On the other hand American Coastal Insurance has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.86%. Given that American Coastal Insurance has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe American Coastal Insurance is more attractive than United Fire Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UFCSUnited Fire Group0 0 0 ACICAmerican Coastal Insurance0 0 0 -
Is UFCS or ACIC More Risky?
United Fire Group has a beta of 0.528, which suggesting that the stock is 47.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Coastal Insurance has a beta of -0.234, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.354%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UFCS or ACIC?
United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. American Coastal Insurance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Fire Group pays -54.42% of its earnings as a dividend. American Coastal Insurance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UFCS or ACIC?
United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $323M, which are larger than American Coastal Insurance quarterly revenues of $82.1M. United Fire Group's net income of $19.7M is lower than American Coastal Insurance's net income of $28.1M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.92x while American Coastal Insurance's PE ratio is 7.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.61x versus 2.14x for American Coastal Insurance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UFCSUnited Fire Group0.61x 14.92x $323M $19.7M ACICAmerican Coastal Insurance2.14x 7.50x $82.1M $28.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns UFCS or ALL?
Allstate has a net margin of 6.12% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 7.16%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 6.91% beat Allstate's return on equity of 23.5%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UFCSUnited Fire Group-- $0.76 $902.8M ALLAllstate-- $4.33 $28.9B -
What do Analysts Say About UFCS or ALL?
United Fire Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -10.19%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $223.18 which suggests that it could grow by 15.3%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than United Fire Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UFCSUnited Fire Group0 0 0 ALLAllstate6 4 1 -
Is UFCS or ALL More Risky?
United Fire Group has a beta of 0.528, which suggesting that the stock is 47.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.504, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.607%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UFCS or ALL?
United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. United Fire Group pays -54.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UFCS or ALL?
United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $323M, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.6B. United Fire Group's net income of $19.7M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.2B. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.92x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.61x versus 0.82x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UFCSUnited Fire Group0.61x 14.92x $323M $19.7M ALLAllstate0.82x 12.54x $16.6B $1.2B
-
Which has Higher Returns UFCS or MCY?
Mercury General has a net margin of 6.12% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 15.09%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 6.91% beat Mercury General's return on equity of 34.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UFCSUnited Fire Group-- $0.76 $902.8M MCYMercury General-- $4.17 $2.4B -
What do Analysts Say About UFCS or MCY?
United Fire Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -10.19%. On the other hand Mercury General has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.32%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than United Fire Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UFCSUnited Fire Group0 0 0 MCYMercury General0 0 0 -
Is UFCS or MCY More Risky?
United Fire Group has a beta of 0.528, which suggesting that the stock is 47.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury General has a beta of 0.840, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.981%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UFCS or MCY?
United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Mercury General offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. United Fire Group pays -54.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General pays out 73% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UFCS or MCY?
United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $323M, which are smaller than Mercury General quarterly revenues of $1.5B. United Fire Group's net income of $19.7M is lower than Mercury General's net income of $230.9M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.92x while Mercury General's PE ratio is 6.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.61x versus 0.69x for Mercury General. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UFCSUnited Fire Group0.61x 14.92x $323M $19.7M MCYMercury General0.69x 6.76x $1.5B $230.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns UFCS or SAFT?
Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 6.12% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 8.89%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 6.91% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 9.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UFCSUnited Fire Group-- $0.76 $902.8M SAFTSafety Insurance Group-- $1.73 $881.4M -
What do Analysts Say About UFCS or SAFT?
United Fire Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -10.19%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -14.76%. Given that Safety Insurance Group has more downside risk than United Fire Group, analysts believe United Fire Group is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UFCSUnited Fire Group0 0 0 SAFTSafety Insurance Group0 0 0 -
Is UFCS or SAFT More Risky?
United Fire Group has a beta of 0.528, which suggesting that the stock is 47.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.191, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.899%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UFCS or SAFT?
United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. United Fire Group pays -54.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 282.34% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UFCS or SAFT?
United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $323M, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $291.1M. United Fire Group's net income of $19.7M is lower than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $25.9M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.92x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 16.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.61x versus 1.12x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UFCSUnited Fire Group0.61x 14.92x $323M $19.7M SAFTSafety Insurance Group1.12x 16.26x $291.1M $25.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns UFCS or TRV?
The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 6.12% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 10.59%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 6.91% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 18.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UFCSUnited Fire Group-- $0.76 $902.8M TRVThe Travelers Companies-- $5.42 $35.7B -
What do Analysts Say About UFCS or TRV?
United Fire Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -10.19%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $264.72 which suggests that it could grow by 9.95%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than United Fire Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UFCSUnited Fire Group0 0 0 TRVThe Travelers Companies4 13 1 -
Is UFCS or TRV More Risky?
United Fire Group has a beta of 0.528, which suggesting that the stock is 47.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.332%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UFCS or TRV?
United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. United Fire Group pays -54.42% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 30.36% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UFCS or TRV?
United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $323M, which are smaller than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $11.9B. United Fire Group's net income of $19.7M is lower than The Travelers Companies's net income of $1.3B. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.92x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 12.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.61x versus 1.23x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UFCSUnited Fire Group0.61x 14.92x $323M $19.7M TRVThe Travelers Companies1.23x 12.35x $11.9B $1.3B
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
