UFCS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kinsale Capital Group has a net margin of 9.48% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 26.47%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.23% beat Kinsale Capital Group's return on equity of 32.24%.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.31%. On the other hand Kinsale Capital Group has an analysts' consensus of $474.11 which suggests that it could grow by 0.87%. Given that United Fire Group has higher upside potential than Kinsale Capital Group, analysts believe United Fire Group is more attractive than Kinsale Capital Group.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.625% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinsale Capital Group has a beta of 1.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.891%.

United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Kinsale Capital Group offers a yield of 0.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. United Fire Group pays 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinsale Capital Group pays out 3.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $331.7M, which are smaller than Kinsale Capital Group quarterly revenues of $412.1M. United Fire Group's net income of $31.4M is lower than Kinsale Capital Group's net income of $109.1M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.08x while Kinsale Capital Group's PE ratio is 26.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.59x versus 6.91x for Kinsale Capital Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ProAssurance has a net margin of 9.48% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 5.69%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.23% beat ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55%.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.31%. On the other hand ProAssurance has an analysts' consensus of $18.25 which suggests that it could fall by -21.2%. Given that United Fire Group has higher upside potential than ProAssurance, analysts believe United Fire Group is more attractive than ProAssurance.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.625% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProAssurance has a beta of 0.210, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.983%.

United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. ProAssurance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Fire Group pays 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. ProAssurance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $331.7M, which are larger than ProAssurance quarterly revenues of $284.3M. United Fire Group's net income of $31.4M is higher than ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.08x while ProAssurance's PE ratio is 22.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.59x versus 1.05x for ProAssurance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 9.48% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 2.86%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.23% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.62%.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.31%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -8.52%. Given that United Fire Group has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe United Fire Group is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.625% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.130, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.01%.

United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. United Fire Group pays 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $331.7M, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $284.7M. United Fire Group's net income of $31.4M is higher than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $8.1M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.08x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 16.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.59x versus 1.02x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a net margin of 9.48% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 1.56%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.23% beat Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 15.73%.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.31%. On the other hand Universal Insurance Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.17%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings is more attractive than United Fire Group.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.625% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.844, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.601%.

United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Universal Insurance Holdings offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. United Fire Group pays 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Insurance Holdings pays out 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $331.7M, which are smaller than Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues of $384.8M. United Fire Group's net income of $31.4M is higher than Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $6M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.08x while Universal Insurance Holdings's PE ratio is 10.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.59x versus 0.41x for Universal Insurance Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.