SAFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 8.89% compared to Safety Insurance Group's net margin of 24.7%. Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 9.26% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 24.78%.

Safety Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -14.76%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $156.33 which suggests that it could grow by 8.14%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.191, which suggesting that the stock is 80.899% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.78%.

Safety Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Safety Insurance Group pays 282.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Safety Insurance Group's is not.

Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $291.1M, which are smaller than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Safety Insurance Group's net income of $25.9M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $820M. Notably, Safety Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.26x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 7.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safety Insurance Group is 1.12x versus 1.88x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Donegal Group has a net margin of 8.89% compared to Safety Insurance Group's net margin of 6.65%. Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 9.26% beat Donegal Group's return on equity of 5.11%.

Safety Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -14.76%. On the other hand Donegal Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.84%. Given that Donegal Group has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Donegal Group is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.191, which suggesting that the stock is 80.899% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donegal Group has a beta of -0.029, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.889%.

Safety Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Donegal Group offers a yield of 4.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Safety Insurance Group pays 282.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Donegal Group pays out 494.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $291.1M, which are larger than Donegal Group quarterly revenues of $251.7M. Safety Insurance Group's net income of $25.9M is higher than Donegal Group's net income of $16.8M. Notably, Safety Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.26x while Donegal Group's PE ratio is 20.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safety Insurance Group is 1.12x versus 0.53x for Donegal Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of 8.89% compared to Safety Insurance Group's net margin of 7.42%. Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 9.26% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.04%.

Safety Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -14.76%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.42%. Given that Selective Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Selective Insurance Group is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.191, which suggesting that the stock is 80.899% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.64%.

Safety Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Safety Insurance Group pays 282.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 22.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Safety Insurance Group's is not.

Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $291.1M, which are smaller than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Safety Insurance Group's net income of $25.9M is lower than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $92.3M. Notably, Safety Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.26x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 25.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safety Insurance Group is 1.12x versus 1.21x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Fire Group has a net margin of 8.89% compared to Safety Insurance Group's net margin of 6.12%. Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 9.26% beat United Fire Group's return on equity of 6.91%.

Safety Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -14.76%. On the other hand United Fire Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.19%. Given that Safety Insurance Group has more downside risk than United Fire Group, analysts believe United Fire Group is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.191, which suggesting that the stock is 80.899% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Fire Group has a beta of 0.528, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.168%.

Safety Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. United Fire Group offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Safety Insurance Group pays 282.34% of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group pays out -54.42% of its earnings as a dividend.

Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $291.1M, which are smaller than United Fire Group quarterly revenues of $323M. Safety Insurance Group's net income of $25.9M is higher than United Fire Group's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Safety Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.26x while United Fire Group's PE ratio is 14.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safety Insurance Group is 1.12x versus 0.61x for United Fire Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.