EPM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Matador Resources has a net margin of 9.43% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of 28.87%. Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54% beat Matador Resources's return on equity of 20.48%.

Evolution Petroleum has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 56.25%. On the other hand Matador Resources has an analysts' consensus of $76.36 which suggests that it could grow by 40.57%. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than Matador Resources, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than Matador Resources.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.868, which suggesting that the stock is 13.231% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matador Resources has a beta of 3.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 226.245%.

Evolution Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.84%. Matador Resources offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Evolution Petroleum pays 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 9.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues are $21.9M, which are smaller than Matador Resources quarterly revenues of $860.1M. Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M is lower than Matador Resources's net income of $248.3M. Notably, Evolution Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.86x while Matador Resources's PE ratio is 7.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution Petroleum is 1.84x versus 1.95x for Matador Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Murphy Oil has a net margin of 9.43% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of 18.47%. Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54% beat Murphy Oil's return on equity of 8.61%.

Evolution Petroleum has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 56.25%. On the other hand Murphy Oil has an analysts' consensus of $41.12 which suggests that it could grow by 45.65%. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than Murphy Oil, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than Murphy Oil.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.868, which suggesting that the stock is 13.231% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Murphy Oil has a beta of 2.179, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.869%.

Evolution Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.84%. Murphy Oil offers a yield of 4.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Evolution Petroleum pays 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Murphy Oil pays out 25.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Murphy Oil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues are $21.9M, which are smaller than Murphy Oil quarterly revenues of $753.2M. Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M is lower than Murphy Oil's net income of $139.1M. Notably, Evolution Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.86x while Murphy Oil's PE ratio is 9.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution Petroleum is 1.84x versus 1.35x for Murphy Oil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ring Energy has a net margin of 9.43% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of 37.96%. Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54% beat Ring Energy's return on equity of 14.15%.

Evolution Petroleum has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 56.25%. On the other hand Ring Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 140%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Evolution Petroleum, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Evolution Petroleum.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.868, which suggesting that the stock is 13.231% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy has a beta of 1.594, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.413%.

Evolution Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.84%. Ring Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evolution Petroleum pays 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues are $21.9M, which are smaller than Ring Energy quarterly revenues of $89.2M. Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M is lower than Ring Energy's net income of $33.9M. Notably, Evolution Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.86x while Ring Energy's PE ratio is 2.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution Petroleum is 1.84x versus 0.65x for Ring Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of 9.43% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of 37.44%. Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26%.

Evolution Petroleum has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 56.25%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $56.36 which suggests that it could grow by 45.4%. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than SM Energy, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than SM Energy.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.868, which suggesting that the stock is 13.231% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 315.189%.

Evolution Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.84%. SM Energy offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Evolution Petroleum pays 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues are $21.9M, which are smaller than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $642.4M. Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M is lower than SM Energy's net income of $240.5M. Notably, Evolution Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.86x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 5.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution Petroleum is 1.84x versus 1.74x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.