INUV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of 0.54% compared to Inuvo's net margin of 20.17%. Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 82.22%.

Inuvo has a consensus price target of $1.40, signalling upside risk potential of 220.95%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $309.41 which suggests that it could grow by 4.77%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Inuvo has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.473%.

Inuvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Inuvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Inuvo quarterly revenues are $26.2M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Inuvo's net income of $141.3K is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $963.2M. Notably, Inuvo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 30.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inuvo is 0.73x versus 6.45x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of 0.54% compared to Inuvo's net margin of 18.49%. Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Inuvo has a consensus price target of $1.40, signalling upside risk potential of 220.95%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $335.29 which suggests that it could grow by 25.46%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Autodesk.

Inuvo has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.556%.

Inuvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inuvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inuvo quarterly revenues are $26.2M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Inuvo's net income of $141.3K is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Inuvo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 52.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inuvo is 0.73x versus 9.46x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Agilysys has a net margin of 0.54% compared to Inuvo's net margin of 5.51%. Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29% beat Agilysys's return on equity of 8.99%.

Inuvo has a consensus price target of $1.40, signalling upside risk potential of 220.95%. On the other hand Agilysys has an analysts' consensus of $135.25 which suggests that it could grow by 83.44%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Agilysys, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Agilysys.

Inuvo has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys has a beta of 0.978, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.249%.

Inuvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inuvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys pays out 1.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Inuvo quarterly revenues are $26.2M, which are smaller than Agilysys quarterly revenues of $69.6M. Inuvo's net income of $141.3K is lower than Agilysys's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Inuvo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Agilysys's PE ratio is 92.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inuvo is 0.73x versus 7.88x for Agilysys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SmartRent has a net margin of 0.54% compared to Inuvo's net margin of -32.3%. Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29% beat SmartRent's return on equity of -10.52%.

Inuvo has a consensus price target of $1.40, signalling upside risk potential of 220.95%. On the other hand SmartRent has an analysts' consensus of $1.68 which suggests that it could grow by 43.16%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than SmartRent, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than SmartRent.

Inuvo has a beta of 0.859, which suggesting that the stock is 14.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SmartRent has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Inuvo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SmartRent offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Inuvo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SmartRent pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Inuvo quarterly revenues are $26.2M, which are smaller than SmartRent quarterly revenues of $35.4M. Inuvo's net income of $141.3K is higher than SmartRent's net income of -$11.4M. Notably, Inuvo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SmartRent's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inuvo is 0.73x versus 1.33x for SmartRent. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.