PAPL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bitcoin Depot has a net margin of -115.23% compared to Pineapple Financial's net margin of -0.69%. Pineapple Financial's return on equity of -118.01% beat Bitcoin Depot's return on equity of -749.29%.

Pineapple Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1122.22%. On the other hand Bitcoin Depot has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 196.68%. Given that Pineapple Financial has higher upside potential than Bitcoin Depot, analysts believe Pineapple Financial is more attractive than Bitcoin Depot.

Pineapple Financial has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bitcoin Depot has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pineapple Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bitcoin Depot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pineapple Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bitcoin Depot pays out -57.49% of its earnings as a dividend.

Pineapple Financial quarterly revenues are $736.5K, which are smaller than Bitcoin Depot quarterly revenues of $135.3M. Pineapple Financial's net income of -$848.6K is higher than Bitcoin Depot's net income of -$939K. Notably, Pineapple Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bitcoin Depot's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pineapple Financial is 0.14x versus 0.05x for Bitcoin Depot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mr. Cooper Group has a net margin of -115.23% compared to Pineapple Financial's net margin of 12.29%. Pineapple Financial's return on equity of -118.01% beat Mr. Cooper Group's return on equity of 11.5%.

Pineapple Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1122.22%. On the other hand Mr. Cooper Group has an analysts' consensus of $111.88 which suggests that it could grow by 17.86%. Given that Pineapple Financial has higher upside potential than Mr. Cooper Group, analysts believe Pineapple Financial is more attractive than Mr. Cooper Group.

Pineapple Financial has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mr. Cooper Group has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.041%.

Pineapple Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mr. Cooper Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pineapple Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mr. Cooper Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pineapple Financial quarterly revenues are $736.5K, which are smaller than Mr. Cooper Group quarterly revenues of $651M. Pineapple Financial's net income of -$848.6K is lower than Mr. Cooper Group's net income of $80M. Notably, Pineapple Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mr. Cooper Group's PE ratio is 12.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pineapple Financial is 0.14x versus 2.32x for Mr. Cooper Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of -115.23% compared to Pineapple Financial's net margin of 23.55%. Pineapple Financial's return on equity of -118.01% beat Robinhood Markets's return on equity of 7.61%.

Pineapple Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1122.22%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets has an analysts' consensus of $45.24 which suggests that it could grow by 14.29%. Given that Pineapple Financial has higher upside potential than Robinhood Markets, analysts believe Pineapple Financial is more attractive than Robinhood Markets.

Pineapple Financial has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pineapple Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Robinhood Markets offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pineapple Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pineapple Financial quarterly revenues are $736.5K, which are smaller than Robinhood Markets quarterly revenues of $637M. Pineapple Financial's net income of -$848.6K is lower than Robinhood Markets's net income of $150M. Notably, Pineapple Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Robinhood Markets's PE ratio is 67.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pineapple Financial is 0.14x versus 14.59x for Robinhood Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hut 8 has a net margin of -115.23% compared to Pineapple Financial's net margin of 1.53%. Pineapple Financial's return on equity of -118.01% beat Hut 8's return on equity of 40.35%.

Pineapple Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1122.22%. On the other hand Hut 8 has an analysts' consensus of $33.63 which suggests that it could grow by 38.49%. Given that Pineapple Financial has higher upside potential than Hut 8, analysts believe Pineapple Financial is more attractive than Hut 8.

Pineapple Financial has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 has a beta of 3.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 254.441%.

Pineapple Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hut 8 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pineapple Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pineapple Financial quarterly revenues are $736.5K, which are smaller than Hut 8 quarterly revenues of $42.2M. Pineapple Financial's net income of -$848.6K is lower than Hut 8's net income of $647K. Notably, Pineapple Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hut 8's PE ratio is 12.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pineapple Financial is 0.14x versus 6.32x for Hut 8. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.