AGCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CEA Industries has a net margin of -8.86% compared to AGCO's net margin of -189.45%. AGCO's return on equity of -9.44% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $98.11, signalling upside risk potential of 19.88%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AGCO has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe AGCO is more attractive than CEA Industries.

AGCO has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.663%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AGCO pays -64.29% of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $390.8K. AGCO's net income of -$255.7M is lower than CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.40x while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.52x versus 2.14x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of -8.86% compared to AGCO's net margin of 10.52%. AGCO's return on equity of -9.44% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 27.37%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $98.11, signalling upside risk potential of 19.88%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $489.89 which suggests that it could grow by 7.75%. Given that AGCO has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe AGCO is more attractive than Deere &.

AGCO has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.33000000000001%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. AGCO pays -64.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $8.3B. AGCO's net income of -$255.7M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $869M. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.40x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 20.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.52x versus 2.66x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of -8.86% compared to AGCO's net margin of 14.21%. AGCO's return on equity of -9.44% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 15.69%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $98.11, signalling upside risk potential of 19.88%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $139.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.57%. Given that AGCO has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe AGCO is more attractive than Lindsay.

AGCO has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.23%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. AGCO pays -64.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $187.1M. AGCO's net income of -$255.7M is lower than Lindsay's net income of $26.6M. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.40x while Lindsay's PE ratio is 17.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.52x versus 2.10x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban-gro has a net margin of -8.86% compared to AGCO's net margin of -13.78%. AGCO's return on equity of -9.44% beat Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $98.11, signalling upside risk potential of 19.88%. On the other hand Urban-gro has an analysts' consensus of $3.57 which suggests that it could grow by 669.01%. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than AGCO, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than AGCO.

AGCO has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban-gro has a beta of 1.652, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.174%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Urban-gro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AGCO pays -64.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Urban-gro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Urban-gro quarterly revenues of $15.5M. AGCO's net income of -$255.7M is lower than Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.40x while Urban-gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.52x versus 0.10x for Urban-gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.