BSIG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cohen & has a net margin of 13.73% compared to BrightSphere Investment Group's net margin of 6.78%. BrightSphere Investment Group's return on equity of 681.63% beat Cohen &'s return on equity of 6.72%.

BrightSphere Investment Group has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.49%. On the other hand Cohen & has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BrightSphere Investment Group has higher upside potential than Cohen &, analysts believe BrightSphere Investment Group is more attractive than Cohen &.

BrightSphere Investment Group has a beta of 1.446, which suggesting that the stock is 44.588% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.774%.

BrightSphere Investment Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.15%. Cohen & offers a yield of 9.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. BrightSphere Investment Group pays 3.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & pays out -34.23% of its earnings as a dividend. BrightSphere Investment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BrightSphere Investment Group quarterly revenues are $123.1M, which are larger than Cohen & quarterly revenues of $31.7M. BrightSphere Investment Group's net income of $16.9M is higher than Cohen &'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, BrightSphere Investment Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.20x while Cohen &'s PE ratio is 2.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BrightSphere Investment Group is 2.25x versus 0.52x for Cohen &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Capital Southwest has a net margin of 13.73% compared to BrightSphere Investment Group's net margin of 82.11%. BrightSphere Investment Group's return on equity of 681.63% beat Capital Southwest's return on equity of 9.95%.

BrightSphere Investment Group has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.49%. On the other hand Capital Southwest has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.99%. Given that Capital Southwest has higher upside potential than BrightSphere Investment Group, analysts believe Capital Southwest is more attractive than BrightSphere Investment Group.

BrightSphere Investment Group has a beta of 1.446, which suggesting that the stock is 44.588% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capital Southwest has a beta of 1.233, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.325%.

BrightSphere Investment Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.15%. Capital Southwest offers a yield of 11.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. BrightSphere Investment Group pays 3.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Southwest pays out 123.43% of its earnings as a dividend. BrightSphere Investment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Capital Southwest's is not.

BrightSphere Investment Group quarterly revenues are $123.1M, which are larger than Capital Southwest quarterly revenues of $27.6M. BrightSphere Investment Group's net income of $16.9M is lower than Capital Southwest's net income of $22.7M. Notably, BrightSphere Investment Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.20x while Capital Southwest's PE ratio is 12.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BrightSphere Investment Group is 2.25x versus 9.14x for Capital Southwest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rand Capital has a net margin of 13.73% compared to BrightSphere Investment Group's net margin of 96.31%. BrightSphere Investment Group's return on equity of 681.63% beat Rand Capital's return on equity of 19.93%.

BrightSphere Investment Group has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.49%. On the other hand Rand Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BrightSphere Investment Group has higher upside potential than Rand Capital, analysts believe BrightSphere Investment Group is more attractive than Rand Capital.

BrightSphere Investment Group has a beta of 1.446, which suggesting that the stock is 44.588% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rand Capital has a beta of 0.477, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.336%.

BrightSphere Investment Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.15%. Rand Capital offers a yield of 9.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. BrightSphere Investment Group pays 3.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Rand Capital pays out 52.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BrightSphere Investment Group quarterly revenues are $123.1M, which are larger than Rand Capital quarterly revenues of $2.7M. BrightSphere Investment Group's net income of $16.9M is higher than Rand Capital's net income of $2.6M. Notably, BrightSphere Investment Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.20x while Rand Capital's PE ratio is 3.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BrightSphere Investment Group is 2.25x versus 3.09x for Rand Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victory Capital Holdings has a net margin of 13.73% compared to BrightSphere Investment Group's net margin of 36.34%. BrightSphere Investment Group's return on equity of 681.63% beat Victory Capital Holdings's return on equity of 24.27%.

BrightSphere Investment Group has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.49%. On the other hand Victory Capital Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $71.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.23%. Given that BrightSphere Investment Group has higher upside potential than Victory Capital Holdings, analysts believe BrightSphere Investment Group is more attractive than Victory Capital Holdings.

BrightSphere Investment Group has a beta of 1.446, which suggesting that the stock is 44.588% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victory Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.217%.

BrightSphere Investment Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.15%. Victory Capital Holdings offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. BrightSphere Investment Group pays 3.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Victory Capital Holdings pays out 40.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BrightSphere Investment Group quarterly revenues are $123.1M, which are smaller than Victory Capital Holdings quarterly revenues of $225.6M. BrightSphere Investment Group's net income of $16.9M is lower than Victory Capital Holdings's net income of $82M. Notably, BrightSphere Investment Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.20x while Victory Capital Holdings's PE ratio is 16.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BrightSphere Investment Group is 2.25x versus 5.01x for Victory Capital Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.