CLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

RDARS has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Celestica's net margin of --. Celestica's return on equity of 21.34% beat RDARS's return on equity of --.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $83.44, signalling downside risk potential of -14.44%. On the other hand RDARS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Celestica has higher upside potential than RDARS, analysts believe Celestica is more attractive than RDARS.

Celestica has a beta of 2.269, which suggesting that the stock is 126.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RDARS has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RDARS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RDARS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than RDARS quarterly revenues of --. Celestica's net income of $91.7M is higher than RDARS's net income of --. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.96x while RDARS's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.26x versus -- for RDARS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siyata Mobile has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Celestica's net margin of -10.68%. Celestica's return on equity of 21.34% beat Siyata Mobile's return on equity of -252.61%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $83.44, signalling downside risk potential of -14.44%. On the other hand Siyata Mobile has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24149.07%. Given that Siyata Mobile has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Siyata Mobile is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 2.269, which suggesting that the stock is 126.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siyata Mobile has a beta of 1.024, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.373%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Siyata Mobile offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siyata Mobile pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Siyata Mobile quarterly revenues of $5.9M. Celestica's net income of $91.7M is higher than Siyata Mobile's net income of -$626.3K. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.96x while Siyata Mobile's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.26x versus 0.31x for Siyata Mobile. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Celestica's net margin of -105.32%. Celestica's return on equity of 21.34% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $83.44, signalling downside risk potential of -14.44%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 469.91%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 2.269, which suggesting that the stock is 126.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 4.159, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 315.934%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Celestica's net income of $91.7M is higher than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.96x while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.26x versus 0.05x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zebra Technologies has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Celestica's net margin of 10.92%. Celestica's return on equity of 21.34% beat Zebra Technologies's return on equity of 11.99%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $83.44, signalling downside risk potential of -14.44%. On the other hand Zebra Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $416.07 which suggests that it could grow by 5.22%. Given that Zebra Technologies has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Zebra Technologies is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 2.269, which suggesting that the stock is 126.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.452%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zebra Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zebra Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Zebra Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Celestica's net income of $91.7M is lower than Zebra Technologies's net income of $137M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.96x while Zebra Technologies's PE ratio is 53.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.26x versus 4.40x for Zebra Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.