HPQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel has a net margin of 4.18% compared to HP's net margin of -0.88%. HP's return on equity of -- beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

HP has a consensus price target of $35.85, signalling upside risk potential of 26.2%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.90 which suggests that it could fall by -4.79%. Given that HP has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe HP is more attractive than Intel.

HP has a beta of 1.097, which suggesting that the stock is 9.651% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.678%.

HP has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Intel offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. HP pays 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. HP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HP quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. HP's net income of $565M is higher than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, HP's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.22x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HP is 0.52x versus 1.94x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 4.18% compared to HP's net margin of 56.17%. HP's return on equity of -- beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

HP has a consensus price target of $35.85, signalling upside risk potential of 26.2%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.50 which suggests that it could grow by 41.77%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than HP, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than HP.

HP has a beta of 1.097, which suggesting that the stock is 9.651% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.581, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.058%.

HP has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. HP pays 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HP quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. HP's net income of $565M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, HP's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.22x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 41.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HP is 0.52x versus 23.13x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qualcomm has a net margin of 4.18% compared to HP's net margin of 27.25%. HP's return on equity of -- beat Qualcomm's return on equity of 42.1%.

HP has a consensus price target of $35.85, signalling upside risk potential of 26.2%. On the other hand Qualcomm has an analysts' consensus of $198.50 which suggests that it could grow by 26.77%. Given that Qualcomm has higher upside potential than HP, analysts believe Qualcomm is more attractive than HP.

HP has a beta of 1.097, which suggesting that the stock is 9.651% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qualcomm has a beta of 1.282, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.223%.

HP has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Qualcomm offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. HP pays 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm pays out 36.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HP quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are larger than Qualcomm quarterly revenues of $11.7B. HP's net income of $565M is lower than Qualcomm's net income of $3.2B. Notably, HP's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.22x while Qualcomm's PE ratio is 16.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HP is 0.52x versus 4.34x for Qualcomm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Super Micro Computer has a net margin of 4.18% compared to HP's net margin of 5.65%. HP's return on equity of -- beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 28.1%.

HP has a consensus price target of $35.85, signalling upside risk potential of 26.2%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $52.34 which suggests that it could grow by 24.11%. Given that HP has higher upside potential than Super Micro Computer, analysts believe HP is more attractive than Super Micro Computer.

HP has a beta of 1.097, which suggesting that the stock is 9.651% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.827%.

HP has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HP pays 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. HP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HP quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are larger than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $5.7B. HP's net income of $565M is higher than Super Micro Computer's net income of $320.6M. Notably, HP's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.22x while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 17.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HP is 0.52x versus 1.28x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.