CNO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AMERISAFE has a net margin of 0.82% compared to CNO Financial Group's net margin of 18.2%. CNO Financial Group's return on equity of 11.83% beat AMERISAFE's return on equity of 19.88%.

CNO Financial Group has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.76%. On the other hand AMERISAFE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.38%. Given that CNO Financial Group has higher upside potential than AMERISAFE, analysts believe CNO Financial Group is more attractive than AMERISAFE.

CNO Financial Group has a beta of 1.026, which suggesting that the stock is 2.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMERISAFE has a beta of 0.330, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.96%.

CNO Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. AMERISAFE offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.37 per share. CNO Financial Group pays 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. AMERISAFE pays out 150.23% of its earnings as a dividend. CNO Financial Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but AMERISAFE's is not.

CNO Financial Group quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than AMERISAFE quarterly revenues of $78.7M. CNO Financial Group's net income of $9.3M is lower than AMERISAFE's net income of $14.3M. Notably, CNO Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.83x while AMERISAFE's PE ratio is 16.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNO Financial Group is 0.90x versus 3.19x for AMERISAFE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a net margin of 0.82% compared to CNO Financial Group's net margin of 11.42%. CNO Financial Group's return on equity of 11.83% beat The Hartford Financial Services Group's return on equity of 19.63%.

CNO Financial Group has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.76%. On the other hand The Hartford Financial Services Group has an analysts' consensus of $129.29 which suggests that it could grow by 18.11%. Given that The Hartford Financial Services Group has higher upside potential than CNO Financial Group, analysts believe The Hartford Financial Services Group is more attractive than CNO Financial Group.

CNO Financial Group has a beta of 1.026, which suggesting that the stock is 2.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hartford Financial Services Group has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.912%.

CNO Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. The Hartford Financial Services Group offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. CNO Financial Group pays 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hartford Financial Services Group pays out 21.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNO Financial Group quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than The Hartford Financial Services Group quarterly revenues of $6.7B. CNO Financial Group's net income of $9.3M is lower than The Hartford Financial Services Group's net income of $767M. Notably, CNO Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.83x while The Hartford Financial Services Group's PE ratio is 10.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNO Financial Group is 0.90x versus 1.27x for The Hartford Financial Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 0.82% compared to CNO Financial Group's net margin of 0.44%. CNO Financial Group's return on equity of 11.83% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -4.42%.

CNO Financial Group has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.76%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $54.86 which suggests that it could grow by 8.15%. Given that CNO Financial Group has higher upside potential than Trupanion, analysts believe CNO Financial Group is more attractive than Trupanion.

CNO Financial Group has a beta of 1.026, which suggesting that the stock is 2.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.454%.

CNO Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CNO Financial Group pays 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CNO Financial Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNO Financial Group quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $327.5M. CNO Financial Group's net income of $9.3M is higher than Trupanion's net income of $1.4M. Notably, CNO Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.83x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNO Financial Group is 0.90x versus 1.72x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unum Group has a net margin of 0.82% compared to CNO Financial Group's net margin of 20.17%. CNO Financial Group's return on equity of 11.83% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 17.3%.

CNO Financial Group has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.76%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $76.73 which suggests that it could grow by 6.55%. Given that CNO Financial Group has higher upside potential than Unum Group, analysts believe CNO Financial Group is more attractive than Unum Group.

CNO Financial Group has a beta of 1.026, which suggesting that the stock is 2.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.792, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.774%.

CNO Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. CNO Financial Group pays 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 21.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CNO Financial Group quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. CNO Financial Group's net income of $9.3M is lower than Unum Group's net income of $645.7M. Notably, CNO Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.83x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 7.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNO Financial Group is 0.90x versus 1.08x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.