AFL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MetLife has a net margin of -3.06% compared to Aflac's net margin of 7.35%. Aflac's return on equity of 16% beat MetLife's return on equity of 13.1%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $105.77, signalling upside risk potential of 3%. On the other hand MetLife has an analysts' consensus of $92.54 which suggests that it could grow by 13.74%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.973, which suggesting that the stock is 2.728% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife has a beta of 1.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.465%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. MetLife offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Aflac pays 20.73% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife pays out 111.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Aflac's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MetLife's is not.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than MetLife quarterly revenues of $18.3B. Aflac's net income of -$93M is lower than MetLife's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.47x while MetLife's PE ratio is 16.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.37x versus 0.83x for MetLife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prudential Financial has a net margin of -3.06% compared to Aflac's net margin of 2.29%. Aflac's return on equity of 16% beat Prudential Financial's return on equity of 13.78%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $105.77, signalling upside risk potential of 3%. On the other hand Prudential Financial has an analysts' consensus of $119.50 which suggests that it could grow by 10.13%. Given that Prudential Financial has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe Prudential Financial is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.973, which suggesting that the stock is 2.728% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.296, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.613%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Prudential Financial offers a yield of 4.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Aflac pays 20.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial pays out 74.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Prudential Financial quarterly revenues of $19.5B. Aflac's net income of -$93M is lower than Prudential Financial's net income of $448M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.47x while Prudential Financial's PE ratio is 10.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.37x versus 0.58x for Prudential Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of -3.06% compared to Aflac's net margin of 0.44%. Aflac's return on equity of 16% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -4.42%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $105.77, signalling upside risk potential of 3%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $54.86 which suggests that it could grow by 8.15%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.973, which suggesting that the stock is 2.728% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.454%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aflac pays 20.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aflac's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $327.5M. Aflac's net income of -$93M is lower than Trupanion's net income of $1.4M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.47x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.37x versus 1.72x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unum Group has a net margin of -3.06% compared to Aflac's net margin of 20.17%. Aflac's return on equity of 16% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 17.3%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $105.77, signalling upside risk potential of 3%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $76.73 which suggests that it could grow by 6.55%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.973, which suggesting that the stock is 2.728% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.792, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.774%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Aflac pays 20.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 21.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Aflac's net income of -$93M is lower than Unum Group's net income of $645.7M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.47x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 7.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.37x versus 1.08x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.