EAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chipotle Mexican Grill has a net margin of 8.73% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 11.66%. Brinker International's return on equity of 4799.27% beat Chipotle Mexican Grill's return on equity of 44.07%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $183.06, signalling upside risk potential of 18.76%. On the other hand Chipotle Mexican Grill has an analysts' consensus of $64.50 which suggests that it could grow by 30.05%. Given that Chipotle Mexican Grill has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Chipotle Mexican Grill is more attractive than Brinker International.

Brinker International has a beta of 2.563, which suggesting that the stock is 156.326% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 1.272, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.176%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chipotle Mexican Grill offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Chipotle Mexican Grill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Chipotle Mexican Grill quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Brinker International's net income of $118.5M is lower than Chipotle Mexican Grill's net income of $331.8M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.72x while Chipotle Mexican Grill's PE ratio is 44.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.47x versus 6.03x for Chipotle Mexican Grill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 8.73% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 10.24%. Brinker International's return on equity of 4799.27% beat Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $183.06, signalling upside risk potential of 18.76%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $209.86 which suggests that it could grow by 0.62%. Given that Brinker International has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Brinker International is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Brinker International has a beta of 2.563, which suggesting that the stock is 156.326% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.273, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.282%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Darden Restaurants offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Brinker International's net income of $118.5M is lower than Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.72x while Darden Restaurants's PE ratio is 23.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.47x versus 2.11x for Darden Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kura Sushi USA has a net margin of 8.73% compared to Brinker International's net margin of -1.49%. Brinker International's return on equity of 4799.27% beat Kura Sushi USA's return on equity of -4.36%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $183.06, signalling upside risk potential of 18.76%. On the other hand Kura Sushi USA has an analysts' consensus of $108.56 which suggests that it could grow by 96.91%. Given that Kura Sushi USA has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Kura Sushi USA is more attractive than Brinker International.

Brinker International has a beta of 2.563, which suggesting that the stock is 156.326% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kura Sushi USA has a beta of 1.824, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.364%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kura Sushi USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Kura Sushi USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Kura Sushi USA quarterly revenues of $64.5M. Brinker International's net income of $118.5M is higher than Kura Sushi USA's net income of -$961K. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.72x while Kura Sushi USA's PE ratio is 732.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.47x versus 2.48x for Kura Sushi USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Starbucks has a net margin of 8.73% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 8.31%. Brinker International's return on equity of 4799.27% beat Starbucks's return on equity of --.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $183.06, signalling upside risk potential of 18.76%. On the other hand Starbucks has an analysts' consensus of $107.51 which suggests that it could grow by 10.75%. Given that Brinker International has higher upside potential than Starbucks, analysts believe Brinker International is more attractive than Starbucks.

Brinker International has a beta of 2.563, which suggesting that the stock is 156.326% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starbucks has a beta of 0.993, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.692%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Starbucks offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks pays out 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Starbucks quarterly revenues of $9.4B. Brinker International's net income of $118.5M is lower than Starbucks's net income of $780.8M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.72x while Starbucks's PE ratio is 31.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.47x versus 3.05x for Starbucks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.