ESAB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kennametal has a net margin of 8.01% compared to ESAB's net margin of 3.72%. ESAB's return on equity of 15.11% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 7.4%.

ESAB has a consensus price target of $133.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.98%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.46%. Given that ESAB has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe ESAB is more attractive than Kennametal.

ESAB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.694, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.41%.

ESAB has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. Kennametal offers a yield of 3.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. ESAB pays 6.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ESAB quarterly revenues are $670.8M, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $482.1M. ESAB's net income of $53.7M is higher than Kennametal's net income of $17.9M. Notably, ESAB's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.42x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 18.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESAB is 2.74x versus 0.87x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Water Products has a net margin of 8.01% compared to ESAB's net margin of 11.6%. ESAB's return on equity of 15.11% beat Mueller Water Products's return on equity of 17.46%.

ESAB has a consensus price target of $133.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.98%. On the other hand Mueller Water Products has an analysts' consensus of $29.17 which suggests that it could grow by 9.65%. Given that Mueller Water Products has higher upside potential than ESAB, analysts believe Mueller Water Products is more attractive than ESAB.

ESAB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Water Products has a beta of 1.393, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.348%.

ESAB has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. Mueller Water Products offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. ESAB pays 6.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products pays out 34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ESAB quarterly revenues are $670.8M, which are larger than Mueller Water Products quarterly revenues of $304.3M. ESAB's net income of $53.7M is higher than Mueller Water Products's net income of $35.3M. Notably, ESAB's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.42x while Mueller Water Products's PE ratio is 30.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESAB is 2.74x versus 3.07x for Mueller Water Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stanley Black & Decker has a net margin of 8.01% compared to ESAB's net margin of 5.24%. ESAB's return on equity of 15.11% beat Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 3.33%.

ESAB has a consensus price target of $133.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.98%. On the other hand Stanley Black & Decker has an analysts' consensus of $100.84 which suggests that it could grow by 25.93%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than ESAB, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than ESAB.

ESAB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.257, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.721%.

ESAB has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. Stanley Black & Decker offers a yield of 4.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. ESAB pays 6.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. ESAB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker's is not.

ESAB quarterly revenues are $670.8M, which are smaller than Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues of $3.7B. ESAB's net income of $53.7M is lower than Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $194.9M. Notably, ESAB's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.42x while Stanley Black & Decker's PE ratio is 41.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESAB is 2.74x versus 0.79x for Stanley Black & Decker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ToughBuilt Industries has a net margin of 8.01% compared to ESAB's net margin of --. ESAB's return on equity of 15.11% beat ToughBuilt Industries's return on equity of --.

ESAB has a consensus price target of $133.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.98%. On the other hand ToughBuilt Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7286.37%. Given that ToughBuilt Industries has higher upside potential than ESAB, analysts believe ToughBuilt Industries is more attractive than ESAB.

ESAB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ToughBuilt Industries has a beta of 2.423, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.306%.

ESAB has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. ToughBuilt Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ESAB pays 6.42% of its earnings as a dividend. ToughBuilt Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESAB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ESAB quarterly revenues are $670.8M, which are larger than ToughBuilt Industries quarterly revenues of --. ESAB's net income of $53.7M is higher than ToughBuilt Industries's net income of --. Notably, ESAB's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.42x while ToughBuilt Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESAB is 2.74x versus 0.01x for ToughBuilt Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.