FHI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evercore has a net margin of 19.95% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of 14.4%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 23.5% beat Evercore's return on equity of 21.3%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $40.86, signalling downside risk potential of -0.15%. On the other hand Evercore has an analysts' consensus of $292.43 which suggests that it could grow by 45.9%. Given that Evercore has higher upside potential than Federated Hermes, analysts believe Evercore is more attractive than Federated Hermes.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.848, which suggesting that the stock is 15.198% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evercore has a beta of 1.341, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.107%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Evercore offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Federated Hermes pays 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Evercore pays out 35.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $424.7M, which are smaller than Evercore quarterly revenues of $975.3M. Federated Hermes's net income of $84.7M is lower than Evercore's net income of $140.4M. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.83x while Evercore's PE ratio is 22.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 1.99x versus 2.80x for Evercore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Global Investors has a net margin of 19.95% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of -3.86%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 23.5% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 1.04%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $40.86, signalling downside risk potential of -0.15%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Federated Hermes has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe Federated Hermes is more attractive than US Global Investors.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.848, which suggesting that the stock is 15.198% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.902, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.214%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Federated Hermes pays 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $424.7M, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Federated Hermes's net income of $84.7M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of -$86K. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.83x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 82.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 1.99x versus 3.31x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 19.95% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of 19.05%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 23.5% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 13.73%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $40.86, signalling downside risk potential of -0.15%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $87.62 which suggests that it could grow by 2.9%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than Federated Hermes, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than Federated Hermes.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.848, which suggesting that the stock is 15.198% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.403%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Federated Hermes pays 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $424.7M, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Federated Hermes's net income of $84.7M is lower than Principal Financial Group's net income of $905.4M. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.83x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 12.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 1.99x versus 1.24x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 19.95% compared to Federated Hermes's net margin of 27.96%. Federated Hermes's return on equity of 23.5% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 25.84%.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $40.86, signalling downside risk potential of -0.15%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $88.17 which suggests that it could grow by 15.81%. Given that SEI Investments has higher upside potential than Federated Hermes, analysts believe SEI Investments is more attractive than Federated Hermes.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.848, which suggesting that the stock is 15.198% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.896, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.448%.

Federated Hermes has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Federated Hermes pays 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 20.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federated Hermes quarterly revenues are $424.7M, which are smaller than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $557.2M. Federated Hermes's net income of $84.7M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $155.8M. Notably, Federated Hermes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.83x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 17.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federated Hermes is 1.99x versus 4.79x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.