FICO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intapp has a net margin of 29.9% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of -3.81%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Intapp's return on equity of -5.44%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,150.03, signalling upside risk potential of 2.14%. On the other hand Intapp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.29%. Given that Intapp has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Intapp is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.360, which suggesting that the stock is 35.956% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intapp has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intapp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intapp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $453.8M, which are larger than Intapp quarterly revenues of $118.8M. Fair Isaac's net income of $135.7M is higher than Intapp's net income of -$4.5M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 102.93x while Intapp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 30.74x versus 10.79x for Intapp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 29.9% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of -9.14%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,150.03, signalling upside risk potential of 2.14%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 141.24%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.360, which suggesting that the stock is 35.956% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.116%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $453.8M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Fair Isaac's net income of $135.7M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 102.93x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 30.74x versus 0.70x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of 29.9% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of -6.7%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,150.03, signalling upside risk potential of 2.14%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 44.77%. Given that Issuer Direct has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Issuer Direct is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.360, which suggesting that the stock is 35.956% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $453.8M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. Fair Isaac's net income of $135.7M is higher than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 102.93x while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 57.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 30.74x versus 1.18x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of 29.9% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 22.41%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Oracle's return on equity of 128.3%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,150.03, signalling upside risk potential of 2.14%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $196.55 which suggests that it could grow by 14.67%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.360, which suggesting that the stock is 35.956% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.029, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.915%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $453.8M, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Fair Isaac's net income of $135.7M is lower than Oracle's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 102.93x while Oracle's PE ratio is 41.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 30.74x versus 8.87x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.