MOV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Movado Group's net margin of -8.63%. Movado Group's return on equity of 4.69% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -8.22%.

Movado Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 91.82%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 37.18%. Given that Movado Group has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, analysts believe Movado Group is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries.

Movado Group has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.083% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.687, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.726%.

Movado Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.07%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 5.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Movado Group pays 113.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -188.65% of its earnings as a dividend.

Movado Group quarterly revenues are $182.7M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $83.4M. Movado Group's net income of $5.1M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, Movado Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.05x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Movado Group is 0.68x versus 0.36x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Movado Group's net margin of 5.54%. Movado Group's return on equity of 4.69% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of 20.22%.

Movado Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 91.82%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 244.29%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Movado Group, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Movado Group.

Movado Group has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.083% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.391, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.083%.

Movado Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.07%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Movado Group pays 113.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Movado Group quarterly revenues are $182.7M, which are larger than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $171.8M. Movado Group's net income of $5.1M is lower than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of $9.5M. Notably, Movado Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.05x while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 2.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Movado Group is 0.68x versus 0.07x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Movado Group's net margin of --. Movado Group's return on equity of 4.69% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Movado Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 91.82%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -26.74%. Given that Movado Group has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Movado Group is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Movado Group has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.083% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.489%.

Movado Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.07%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Movado Group pays 113.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Movado Group quarterly revenues are $182.7M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Movado Group's net income of $5.1M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Movado Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.05x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Movado Group is 0.68x versus 273.78x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Movado Group's net margin of --. Movado Group's return on equity of 4.69% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Movado Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 91.82%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Movado Group has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Movado Group is more attractive than Northann.

Movado Group has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.083% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Movado Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.07%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Movado Group pays 113.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Movado Group quarterly revenues are $182.7M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Movado Group's net income of $5.1M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Movado Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.05x while Northann's PE ratio is 37.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Movado Group is 0.68x versus 0.47x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.