NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Buy
70
NAPA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$11.11
Seasonality move
:
-9.8%
Day range:
$11.09 - $11.11
52-week range:
$5.38 - $11.11
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
26.45x
P/S ratio:
3.43x
P/B ratio:
1.27x
Volume:
1.3M
Avg. volume:
1.3M
1-year change:
15.73%
Market cap:
$1.6B
Revenue:
$405.5M
EPS (TTM):
$0.42
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NAPA
The Duckhorn Portfolio
|
$126.6M | $0.16 | 23% | 40.54% | $11.11 |
|
ACU
Acme United
|
-- | -- | 0.32% | -- | -- |
|
PEP
PepsiCo
|
$23.8B | $2.29 | 0.39% | 107.25% | -- |
|
SBEV
Splash Beverage Group
|
$2.1M | -$0.08 | -69.37% | -30.77% | -- |
|
STZ
Constellation Brands
|
$2.5B | $3.32 | 3.24% | 20.82% | $289.20 |
|
VINE
Fresh Vine Wine
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NAPA
The Duckhorn Portfolio
|
$11.11 | $11.11 | $1.6B | 26.45x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.43x |
|
ACU
Acme United
|
$37.89 | -- | $141.8M | 7.75x | $0.15 | 1.58% | 0.81x |
|
PEP
PepsiCo
|
$152.79 | -- | $209.6B | 22.54x | $1.36 | 3.49% | 2.29x |
|
SBEV
Splash Beverage Group
|
$0.15 | -- | $9.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.85x |
|
STZ
Constellation Brands
|
$227.63 | $289.20 | $41.3B | 73.67x | $1.01 | 1.72% | 4.09x |
|
VINE
Fresh Vine Wine
|
$0.63 | -- | $10M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 21.03x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NAPA
The Duckhorn Portfolio
|
18.47% | -2.656 | 18.03% | 0.55x |
|
ACU
Acme United
|
23.37% | 1.101 | 20.81% | 1.65x |
|
PEP
PepsiCo
|
69.83% | -0.129 | 19.27% | 0.66x |
|
SBEV
Splash Beverage Group
|
18623.46% | 3.589 | 70.55% | 0.07x |
|
STZ
Constellation Brands
|
53.68% | 1.217 | 25.85% | 0.31x |
|
VINE
Fresh Vine Wine
|
-9.21% | 1.152 | 2.44% | 0.03x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NAPA
The Duckhorn Portfolio
|
$61.5M | $20.7M | 3.59% | 4.49% | 16.74% | $15.7M |
|
ACU
Acme United
|
$18.6M | $2.9M | 14.7% | 19.79% | 6.18% | $7.5M |
|
PEP
PepsiCo
|
$12.9B | $3.9B | 14.59% | 48.74% | 16.78% | $3.8B |
|
SBEV
Splash Beverage Group
|
$291K | -$2.7M | -1037.32% | -- | -305.43% | -$2.6M |
|
STZ
Constellation Brands
|
$1.4B | $941.6M | 11.37% | 25.15% | 38.46% | $315.2M |
|
VINE
Fresh Vine Wine
|
$152.7K | -$309K | -696.47% | -697.95% | -488.8% | -$400.2K |
The Duckhorn Portfolio vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NAPA or ACU?
Acme United has a net margin of 9.08% compared to The Duckhorn Portfolio's net margin of 4.62%. The Duckhorn Portfolio's return on equity of 4.49% beat Acme United's return on equity of 19.79%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NAPAThe Duckhorn Portfolio50.02% $0.08 $1.6B ACUAcme United38.54% $0.54 $138.7M -
What do Analysts Say About NAPA or ACU?
The Duckhorn Portfolio has a consensus price target of $11.11, signalling upside risk potential of 0.99%. On the other hand Acme United has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 53.08%. Given that Acme United has higher upside potential than The Duckhorn Portfolio, analysts believe Acme United is more attractive than The Duckhorn Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NAPAThe Duckhorn Portfolio4 3 0 ACUAcme United0 0 0 -
Is NAPA or ACU More Risky?
The Duckhorn Portfolio has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acme United has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.72%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAPA or ACU?
The Duckhorn Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Acme United offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. The Duckhorn Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acme United pays out 11.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Acme United's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NAPA or ACU?
The Duckhorn Portfolio quarterly revenues are $122.9M, which are larger than Acme United quarterly revenues of $48.2M. The Duckhorn Portfolio's net income of $11.2M is higher than Acme United's net income of $2.2M. Notably, The Duckhorn Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.45x while Acme United's PE ratio is 7.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Duckhorn Portfolio is 3.43x versus 0.81x for Acme United. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NAPAThe Duckhorn Portfolio3.43x 26.45x $122.9M $11.2M ACUAcme United0.81x 7.75x $48.2M $2.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns NAPA or PEP?
PepsiCo has a net margin of 9.08% compared to The Duckhorn Portfolio's net margin of 12.57%. The Duckhorn Portfolio's return on equity of 4.49% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 48.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NAPAThe Duckhorn Portfolio50.02% $0.08 $1.6B PEPPepsiCo55.42% $2.13 $64.6B -
What do Analysts Say About NAPA or PEP?
The Duckhorn Portfolio has a consensus price target of $11.11, signalling upside risk potential of 0.99%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.55%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than The Duckhorn Portfolio, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than The Duckhorn Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NAPAThe Duckhorn Portfolio4 3 0 PEPPepsiCo6 11 1 -
Is NAPA or PEP More Risky?
The Duckhorn Portfolio has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.526, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.414%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAPA or PEP?
The Duckhorn Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. The Duckhorn Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 73.64% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NAPA or PEP?
The Duckhorn Portfolio quarterly revenues are $122.9M, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $23.3B. The Duckhorn Portfolio's net income of $11.2M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $2.9B. Notably, The Duckhorn Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.45x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 22.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Duckhorn Portfolio is 3.43x versus 2.29x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NAPAThe Duckhorn Portfolio3.43x 26.45x $122.9M $11.2M PEPPepsiCo2.29x 22.54x $23.3B $2.9B
-
Which has Higher Returns NAPA or SBEV?
Splash Beverage Group has a net margin of 9.08% compared to The Duckhorn Portfolio's net margin of -480.68%. The Duckhorn Portfolio's return on equity of 4.49% beat Splash Beverage Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NAPAThe Duckhorn Portfolio50.02% $0.08 $1.6B SBEVSplash Beverage Group29.64% -$0.08 $58.5K -
What do Analysts Say About NAPA or SBEV?
The Duckhorn Portfolio has a consensus price target of $11.11, signalling upside risk potential of 0.99%. On the other hand Splash Beverage Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 401.34%. Given that Splash Beverage Group has higher upside potential than The Duckhorn Portfolio, analysts believe Splash Beverage Group is more attractive than The Duckhorn Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NAPAThe Duckhorn Portfolio4 3 0 SBEVSplash Beverage Group0 0 0 -
Is NAPA or SBEV More Risky?
The Duckhorn Portfolio has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Splash Beverage Group has a beta of 1.046, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.572%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAPA or SBEV?
The Duckhorn Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Splash Beverage Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Duckhorn Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Splash Beverage Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NAPA or SBEV?
The Duckhorn Portfolio quarterly revenues are $122.9M, which are larger than Splash Beverage Group quarterly revenues of $981.9K. The Duckhorn Portfolio's net income of $11.2M is higher than Splash Beverage Group's net income of -$4.7M. Notably, The Duckhorn Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.45x while Splash Beverage Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Duckhorn Portfolio is 3.43x versus 0.85x for Splash Beverage Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NAPAThe Duckhorn Portfolio3.43x 26.45x $122.9M $11.2M SBEVSplash Beverage Group0.85x -- $981.9K -$4.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns NAPA or STZ?
Constellation Brands has a net margin of 9.08% compared to The Duckhorn Portfolio's net margin of 32.95%. The Duckhorn Portfolio's return on equity of 4.49% beat Constellation Brands's return on equity of 25.15%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NAPAThe Duckhorn Portfolio50.02% $0.08 $1.6B STZConstellation Brands52.74% $4.78 $22.5B -
What do Analysts Say About NAPA or STZ?
The Duckhorn Portfolio has a consensus price target of $11.11, signalling upside risk potential of 0.99%. On the other hand Constellation Brands has an analysts' consensus of $289.20 which suggests that it could grow by 27.05%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than The Duckhorn Portfolio, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than The Duckhorn Portfolio.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NAPAThe Duckhorn Portfolio4 3 0 STZConstellation Brands10 5 0 -
Is NAPA or STZ More Risky?
The Duckhorn Portfolio has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.805%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAPA or STZ?
The Duckhorn Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Constellation Brands offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. The Duckhorn Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Brands pays out 37.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NAPA or STZ?
The Duckhorn Portfolio quarterly revenues are $122.9M, which are smaller than Constellation Brands quarterly revenues of $2.7B. The Duckhorn Portfolio's net income of $11.2M is lower than Constellation Brands's net income of $877M. Notably, The Duckhorn Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.45x while Constellation Brands's PE ratio is 73.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Duckhorn Portfolio is 3.43x versus 4.09x for Constellation Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NAPAThe Duckhorn Portfolio3.43x 26.45x $122.9M $11.2M STZConstellation Brands4.09x 73.67x $2.7B $877M
-
Which has Higher Returns NAPA or VINE?
Fresh Vine Wine has a net margin of 9.08% compared to The Duckhorn Portfolio's net margin of -498.81%. The Duckhorn Portfolio's return on equity of 4.49% beat Fresh Vine Wine's return on equity of -697.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NAPAThe Duckhorn Portfolio50.02% $0.08 $1.6B VINEFresh Vine Wine-61.97% -$0.02 -$2.2M -
What do Analysts Say About NAPA or VINE?
The Duckhorn Portfolio has a consensus price target of $11.11, signalling upside risk potential of 0.99%. On the other hand Fresh Vine Wine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Duckhorn Portfolio has higher upside potential than Fresh Vine Wine, analysts believe The Duckhorn Portfolio is more attractive than Fresh Vine Wine.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NAPAThe Duckhorn Portfolio4 3 0 VINEFresh Vine Wine0 0 0 -
Is NAPA or VINE More Risky?
The Duckhorn Portfolio has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fresh Vine Wine has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAPA or VINE?
The Duckhorn Portfolio has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fresh Vine Wine offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Duckhorn Portfolio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fresh Vine Wine pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NAPA or VINE?
The Duckhorn Portfolio quarterly revenues are $122.9M, which are larger than Fresh Vine Wine quarterly revenues of $63.2K. The Duckhorn Portfolio's net income of $11.2M is higher than Fresh Vine Wine's net income of -$315.3K. Notably, The Duckhorn Portfolio's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.45x while Fresh Vine Wine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Duckhorn Portfolio is 3.43x versus 21.03x for Fresh Vine Wine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NAPAThe Duckhorn Portfolio3.43x 26.45x $122.9M $11.2M VINEFresh Vine Wine21.03x -- $63.2K -$315.3K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 6.46% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 14.53% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 4.83% over the past day.
