STZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 32.95% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of 24.03%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of 25.15% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49%.

Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $289.20, signalling upside risk potential of 27.05%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $73.72 which suggests that it could grow by 17.85%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.805% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.255%.

Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 3.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Constellation Brands pays 37.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.9B. Constellation Brands's net income of $877M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.67x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 25.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 4.09x versus 5.83x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Duckhorn Portfolio has a net margin of 32.95% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of 9.08%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of 25.15% beat The Duckhorn Portfolio's return on equity of 4.49%.

Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $289.20, signalling upside risk potential of 27.05%. On the other hand The Duckhorn Portfolio has an analysts' consensus of $11.11 which suggests that it could grow by 0.99%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than The Duckhorn Portfolio, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than The Duckhorn Portfolio.

Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.805% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Duckhorn Portfolio has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. The Duckhorn Portfolio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellation Brands pays 37.85% of its earnings as a dividend. The Duckhorn Portfolio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than The Duckhorn Portfolio quarterly revenues of $122.9M. Constellation Brands's net income of $877M is higher than The Duckhorn Portfolio's net income of $11.2M. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.67x while The Duckhorn Portfolio's PE ratio is 26.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 4.09x versus 3.43x for The Duckhorn Portfolio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Boston Beer has a net margin of 32.95% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of 5.54%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of 25.15% beat Boston Beer's return on equity of 7.58%.

Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $289.20, signalling upside risk potential of 27.05%. On the other hand Boston Beer has an analysts' consensus of $319.91 which suggests that it could grow by 3.14%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Boston Beer, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Boston Beer.

Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.805% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boston Beer has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.859%.

Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Boston Beer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellation Brands pays 37.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Boston Beer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Boston Beer quarterly revenues of $605.5M. Constellation Brands's net income of $877M is higher than Boston Beer's net income of $33.5M. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.67x while Boston Beer's PE ratio is 44.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 4.09x versus 1.81x for Boston Beer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Molson Coors Beverage has a net margin of 32.95% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of 6.57%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of 25.15% beat Molson Coors Beverage's return on equity of 6.97%.

Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $289.20, signalling upside risk potential of 27.05%. On the other hand Molson Coors Beverage has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6.45%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Molson Coors Beverage, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Molson Coors Beverage.

Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.805% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Molson Coors Beverage has a beta of 0.854, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.562%.

Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Molson Coors Beverage offers a yield of 2.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Constellation Brands pays 37.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Molson Coors Beverage pays out 37.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Molson Coors Beverage quarterly revenues of $3B. Constellation Brands's net income of $877M is higher than Molson Coors Beverage's net income of $199.8M. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 73.67x while Molson Coors Beverage's PE ratio is 13.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 4.09x versus 1.08x for Molson Coors Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.