NWN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

OPAL Fuels has a net margin of 12.13% compared to Northwest Natural Holding's net margin of 1.61%. Northwest Natural Holding's return on equity of 5.87% beat OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.4%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a consensus price target of $46.80, signalling upside risk potential of 13.1%. On the other hand OPAL Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $5.19 which suggests that it could grow by 159.38%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than Northwest Natural Holding, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than Northwest Natural Holding.

Northwest Natural Holding has a beta of 0.588, which suggesting that the stock is 41.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.73%. OPAL Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northwest Natural Holding pays 92.37% of its earnings as a dividend. OPAL Fuels pays out 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Northwest Natural Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

Northwest Natural Holding quarterly revenues are $370.9M, which are larger than OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues of $80M. Northwest Natural Holding's net income of $45M is higher than OPAL Fuels's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Northwest Natural Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.40x while OPAL Fuels's PE ratio is 100.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northwest Natural Holding is 1.39x versus 0.18x for OPAL Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RGC Resources has a net margin of 12.13% compared to Northwest Natural Holding's net margin of 19.31%. Northwest Natural Holding's return on equity of 5.87% beat RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.07%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a consensus price target of $46.80, signalling upside risk potential of 13.1%. On the other hand RGC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.19%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Northwest Natural Holding, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Northwest Natural Holding.

Northwest Natural Holding has a beta of 0.588, which suggesting that the stock is 41.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RGC Resources has a beta of 0.245, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.455%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.73%. RGC Resources offers a yield of 3.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Northwest Natural Holding pays 92.37% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northwest Natural Holding quarterly revenues are $370.9M, which are larger than RGC Resources quarterly revenues of $27.3M. Northwest Natural Holding's net income of $45M is higher than RGC Resources's net income of $5.3M. Notably, Northwest Natural Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.40x while RGC Resources's PE ratio is 17.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northwest Natural Holding is 1.39x versus 2.44x for RGC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sempra has a net margin of 12.13% compared to Northwest Natural Holding's net margin of 17.99%. Northwest Natural Holding's return on equity of 5.87% beat Sempra's return on equity of 8.07%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a consensus price target of $46.80, signalling upside risk potential of 13.1%. On the other hand Sempra has an analysts' consensus of $82.29 which suggests that it could grow by 17.12%. Given that Sempra has higher upside potential than Northwest Natural Holding, analysts believe Sempra is more attractive than Northwest Natural Holding.

Northwest Natural Holding has a beta of 0.588, which suggesting that the stock is 41.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sempra has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.537%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.73%. Sempra offers a yield of 3.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Northwest Natural Holding pays 92.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra pays out 53.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northwest Natural Holding quarterly revenues are $370.9M, which are smaller than Sempra quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Northwest Natural Holding's net income of $45M is lower than Sempra's net income of $676M. Notably, Northwest Natural Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.40x while Sempra's PE ratio is 15.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northwest Natural Holding is 1.39x versus 3.40x for Sempra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southwest Gas Holdings has a net margin of 12.13% compared to Northwest Natural Holding's net margin of 7.28%. Northwest Natural Holding's return on equity of 5.87% beat Southwest Gas Holdings's return on equity of 5.59%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a consensus price target of $46.80, signalling upside risk potential of 13.1%. On the other hand Southwest Gas Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $79.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.04%. Given that Northwest Natural Holding has higher upside potential than Southwest Gas Holdings, analysts believe Northwest Natural Holding is more attractive than Southwest Gas Holdings.

Northwest Natural Holding has a beta of 0.588, which suggesting that the stock is 41.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southwest Gas Holdings has a beta of 0.372, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.82%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.73%. Southwest Gas Holdings offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Northwest Natural Holding pays 92.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Southwest Gas Holdings pays out 89.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northwest Natural Holding quarterly revenues are $370.9M, which are smaller than Southwest Gas Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Northwest Natural Holding's net income of $45M is lower than Southwest Gas Holdings's net income of $92.5M. Notably, Northwest Natural Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.40x while Southwest Gas Holdings's PE ratio is 27.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northwest Natural Holding is 1.39x versus 1.06x for Southwest Gas Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.