OSK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 5.89% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 8.2%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.29% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $114.71, signalling upside risk potential of 33.42%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $256.40 which suggests that it could grow by 15.48%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than L3Harris Technologies, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than L3Harris Technologies.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.023% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.715, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.488%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Oshkosh's net income of $153.1M is lower than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.31x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 28.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.53x versus 1.99x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR has a net margin of 5.89% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 11.03%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.29% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 24.02%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $114.71, signalling upside risk potential of 33.42%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $107.11 which suggests that it could grow by 18.39%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than PACCAR.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.023% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.956, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.355%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Oshkosh's net income of $153.1M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $872M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.31x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 11.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.53x versus 1.42x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of 5.89% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of -1.69%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.29% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.12%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $114.71, signalling upside risk potential of 33.42%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 94.48%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.023% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.831, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.148%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 2.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out -249.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $201.4M. Oshkosh's net income of $153.1M is higher than The Shyft Group's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.31x while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.53x versus 0.35x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos has a net margin of 5.89% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of -66.57%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.29% beat Xos's return on equity of -80.19%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $114.71, signalling upside risk potential of 33.42%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of $6.33 which suggests that it could grow by 89.06%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.023% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $15.8M. Oshkosh's net income of $153.1M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.5M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.31x while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.53x versus 0.45x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.