PCAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cummins has a net margin of 11.03% compared to PACCAR's net margin of 4.95%. PACCAR's return on equity of 24.02% beat Cummins's return on equity of 37.07%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $111.72, signalling upside risk potential of 22.93%. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $377.97 which suggests that it could grow by 36.15%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.355% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.555%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Cummins offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. PACCAR pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $7.9B, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.4B. PACCAR's net income of $872M is higher than Cummins's net income of $418M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.49x while Cummins's PE ratio is 9.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.42x versus 1.13x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oshkosh has a net margin of 11.03% compared to PACCAR's net margin of 5.89%. PACCAR's return on equity of 24.02% beat Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.29%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $111.72, signalling upside risk potential of 22.93%. On the other hand Oshkosh has an analysts' consensus of $123.25 which suggests that it could grow by 49.25%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.355% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.023%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Oshkosh offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. PACCAR pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh pays out 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $7.9B, which are larger than Oshkosh quarterly revenues of $2.6B. PACCAR's net income of $872M is higher than Oshkosh's net income of $153.1M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.49x while Oshkosh's PE ratio is 7.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.42x versus 0.51x for Oshkosh. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of 11.03% compared to PACCAR's net margin of -1.69%. PACCAR's return on equity of 24.02% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.12%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $111.72, signalling upside risk potential of 22.93%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 92.31%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.355% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.831, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.148%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. PACCAR pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out -249.59% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $7.9B, which are larger than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $201.4M. PACCAR's net income of $872M is higher than The Shyft Group's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.49x while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.42x versus 0.35x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos has a net margin of 11.03% compared to PACCAR's net margin of -66.57%. PACCAR's return on equity of 24.02% beat Xos's return on equity of -80.19%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $111.72, signalling upside risk potential of 22.93%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of $6.33 which suggests that it could grow by 113.96%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.355% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PACCAR pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $7.9B, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $15.8M. PACCAR's net income of $872M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.5M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.49x while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.42x versus 0.40x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.