PARR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CVR Energy has a net margin of -3.04% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of 1.49%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -2.62% beat CVR Energy's return on equity of 0.82%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling upside risk potential of 58.67%. On the other hand CVR Energy has an analysts' consensus of $19.67 which suggests that it could grow by 22.46%. Given that Par Pacific Holdings has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe Par Pacific Holdings is more attractive than CVR Energy.

Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.642, which suggesting that the stock is 64.18% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVR Energy has a beta of 1.278, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.842%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVR Energy offers a yield of 12.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVR Energy pays out 2157.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than CVR Energy quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$55.7M is lower than CVR Energy's net income of $29M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while CVR Energy's PE ratio is 267.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.09x versus 0.21x for CVR Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HF Sinclair has a net margin of -3.04% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of -3.29%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -2.62% beat HF Sinclair's return on equity of 1.79%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling upside risk potential of 58.67%. On the other hand HF Sinclair has an analysts' consensus of $44.45 which suggests that it could grow by 61.68%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Par Pacific Holdings, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Par Pacific Holdings.

Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.642, which suggesting that the stock is 64.18% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.999, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.144%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HF Sinclair offers a yield of 7.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HF Sinclair pays out 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend.

Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than HF Sinclair quarterly revenues of $6.5B. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$55.7M is higher than HF Sinclair's net income of -$213.5M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while HF Sinclair's PE ratio is 33.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.09x versus 0.18x for HF Sinclair. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of -3.04% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of 0.02%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -2.62% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 7%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling upside risk potential of 58.67%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $139.44 which suggests that it could grow by 41.12%. Given that Par Pacific Holdings has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Par Pacific Holdings is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.642, which suggesting that the stock is 64.18% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.493%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 4.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $33.7B. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$55.7M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $8M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 20.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.09x versus 0.29x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of -3.04% compared to Par Pacific Holdings's net margin of 0.91%. Par Pacific Holdings's return on equity of -2.62% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 9.81%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling upside risk potential of 58.67%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $149.26 which suggests that it could grow by 42.58%. Given that Par Pacific Holdings has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Par Pacific Holdings is more attractive than Valero Energy.

Par Pacific Holdings has a beta of 1.642, which suggesting that the stock is 64.18% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.193%.

Par Pacific Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. Par Pacific Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Par Pacific Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $30.8B. Par Pacific Holdings's net income of -$55.7M is lower than Valero Energy's net income of $281M. Notably, Par Pacific Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 12.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Par Pacific Holdings is 0.09x versus 0.26x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.