PLOW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dorman Products has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Douglas Dynamics's net margin of 10.21%. Douglas Dynamics's return on equity of 23.2% beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 15.65%.

Douglas Dynamics has a consensus price target of $33.67, signalling upside risk potential of 44.74%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of $144.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.83%. Given that Douglas Dynamics has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, analysts believe Douglas Dynamics is more attractive than Dorman Products.

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.48% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.871, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.852%.

Douglas Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.07%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Douglas Dynamics pays 48.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Douglas Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Douglas Dynamics quarterly revenues are $143.5M, which are smaller than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $533.8M. Douglas Dynamics's net income of $7.9M is lower than Dorman Products's net income of $54.5M. Notably, Douglas Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.94x while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 19.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Douglas Dynamics is 0.95x versus 1.89x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Douglas Dynamics's net margin of --. Douglas Dynamics's return on equity of 23.2% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Douglas Dynamics has a consensus price target of $33.67, signalling upside risk potential of 44.74%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 43.89%. Given that Douglas Dynamics has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Douglas Dynamics is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.48% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.799%.

Douglas Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.07%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Douglas Dynamics pays 48.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Douglas Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Douglas Dynamics quarterly revenues are $143.5M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Douglas Dynamics's net income of $7.9M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Douglas Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.94x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Douglas Dynamics is 0.95x versus 125.65x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Douglas Dynamics's net margin of 1.5%. Douglas Dynamics's return on equity of 23.2% beat Monro's return on equity of 3.03%.

Douglas Dynamics has a consensus price target of $33.67, signalling upside risk potential of 44.74%. On the other hand Monro has an analysts' consensus of $20.50 which suggests that it could grow by 40.51%. Given that Douglas Dynamics has higher upside potential than Monro, analysts believe Douglas Dynamics is more attractive than Monro.

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.48% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro has a beta of 1.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.082%.

Douglas Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.07%. Monro offers a yield of 7.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Douglas Dynamics pays 48.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Monro pays out 94.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Douglas Dynamics quarterly revenues are $143.5M, which are smaller than Monro quarterly revenues of $305.8M. Douglas Dynamics's net income of $7.9M is higher than Monro's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Douglas Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.94x while Monro's PE ratio is 22.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Douglas Dynamics is 0.95x versus 0.38x for Monro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Motorcar Parts of America has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Douglas Dynamics's net margin of 1.23%. Douglas Dynamics's return on equity of 23.2% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity of -6.4%.

Douglas Dynamics has a consensus price target of $33.67, signalling upside risk potential of 44.74%. On the other hand Motorcar Parts of America has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.36%. Given that Motorcar Parts of America has higher upside potential than Douglas Dynamics, analysts believe Motorcar Parts of America is more attractive than Douglas Dynamics.

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.48% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.186%.

Douglas Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.07%. Motorcar Parts of America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Douglas Dynamics pays 48.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Motorcar Parts of America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Douglas Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Douglas Dynamics quarterly revenues are $143.5M, which are smaller than Motorcar Parts of America quarterly revenues of $186.2M. Douglas Dynamics's net income of $7.9M is higher than Motorcar Parts of America's net income of $2.3M. Notably, Douglas Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.94x while Motorcar Parts of America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Douglas Dynamics is 0.95x versus 0.24x for Motorcar Parts of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.