RDN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American International Group has a net margin of 45.56% compared to Radian Group's net margin of 6.8%. Radian Group's return on equity of 13.51% beat American International Group's return on equity of -4.74%.

Radian Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.44%. On the other hand American International Group has an analysts' consensus of $84.41 which suggests that it could grow by 16.13%. Given that American International Group has higher upside potential than Radian Group, analysts believe American International Group is more attractive than Radian Group.

Radian Group has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.628% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American International Group has a beta of 1.048, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.794%.

Radian Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.06%. American International Group offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Radian Group pays 24.19% of its earnings as a dividend. American International Group pays out 28.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Radian Group quarterly revenues are $333.4M, which are smaller than American International Group quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Radian Group's net income of $151.9M is lower than American International Group's net income of $459M. Notably, Radian Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.30x while American International Group's PE ratio is 11.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radian Group is 3.82x versus 0.95x for American International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 45.56% compared to Radian Group's net margin of 24.7%. Radian Group's return on equity of 13.51% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 24.78%.

Radian Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.44%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $156.33 which suggests that it could grow by 8.14%. Given that Radian Group has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe Radian Group is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Radian Group has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.628% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.78%.

Radian Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.06%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Radian Group pays 24.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Radian Group quarterly revenues are $333.4M, which are smaller than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Radian Group's net income of $151.9M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $820M. Notably, Radian Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.30x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 7.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radian Group is 3.82x versus 1.88x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a net margin of 45.56% compared to Radian Group's net margin of 11.42%. Radian Group's return on equity of 13.51% beat The Hartford Financial Services Group's return on equity of 19.63%.

Radian Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.44%. On the other hand The Hartford Financial Services Group has an analysts' consensus of $129.29 which suggests that it could grow by 18.11%. Given that The Hartford Financial Services Group has higher upside potential than Radian Group, analysts believe The Hartford Financial Services Group is more attractive than Radian Group.

Radian Group has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.628% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hartford Financial Services Group has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.912%.

Radian Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.06%. The Hartford Financial Services Group offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Radian Group pays 24.19% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hartford Financial Services Group pays out 21.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Radian Group quarterly revenues are $333.4M, which are smaller than The Hartford Financial Services Group quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Radian Group's net income of $151.9M is lower than The Hartford Financial Services Group's net income of $767M. Notably, Radian Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.30x while The Hartford Financial Services Group's PE ratio is 10.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radian Group is 3.82x versus 1.27x for The Hartford Financial Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MGIC Investment has a net margin of 45.56% compared to Radian Group's net margin of 65.21%. Radian Group's return on equity of 13.51% beat MGIC Investment's return on equity of 14.99%.

Radian Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.44%. On the other hand MGIC Investment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.19%. Given that Radian Group has higher upside potential than MGIC Investment, analysts believe Radian Group is more attractive than MGIC Investment.

Radian Group has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.628% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MGIC Investment has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.022%.

Radian Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.06%. MGIC Investment offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Radian Group pays 24.19% of its earnings as a dividend. MGIC Investment pays out 17.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Radian Group quarterly revenues are $333.4M, which are larger than MGIC Investment quarterly revenues of $306.6M. Radian Group's net income of $151.9M is lower than MGIC Investment's net income of $200M. Notably, Radian Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.30x while MGIC Investment's PE ratio is 8.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radian Group is 3.82x versus 5.37x for MGIC Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.