MTG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a net margin of 61.27% compared to MGIC Investment's net margin of 12.54%. MGIC Investment's return on equity of 14.81% beat The Hartford Financial Services Group's return on equity of 19.46%.

MGIC Investment has a consensus price target of $27.14, signalling upside risk potential of 9.54%. On the other hand The Hartford Financial Services Group has an analysts' consensus of $129.29 which suggests that it could grow by 4.5%. Given that MGIC Investment has higher upside potential than The Hartford Financial Services Group, analysts believe MGIC Investment is more attractive than The Hartford Financial Services Group.

MGIC Investment has a beta of 0.933, which suggesting that the stock is 6.749% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hartford Financial Services Group has a beta of 0.679, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.111%.

MGIC Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. The Hartford Financial Services Group offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. MGIC Investment pays 17.1% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hartford Financial Services Group pays out 18.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGIC Investment quarterly revenues are $301.4M, which are smaller than The Hartford Financial Services Group quarterly revenues of $6.8B. MGIC Investment's net income of $184.7M is lower than The Hartford Financial Services Group's net income of $853M. Notably, MGIC Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.54x while The Hartford Financial Services Group's PE ratio is 11.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGIC Investment is 5.42x versus 1.40x for The Hartford Financial Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radian Group has a net margin of 61.27% compared to MGIC Investment's net margin of 46.88%. MGIC Investment's return on equity of 14.81% beat Radian Group's return on equity of 13.35%.

MGIC Investment has a consensus price target of $27.14, signalling upside risk potential of 9.54%. On the other hand Radian Group has an analysts' consensus of $36.43 which suggests that it could grow by 10.16%. Given that Radian Group has higher upside potential than MGIC Investment, analysts believe Radian Group is more attractive than MGIC Investment.

MGIC Investment has a beta of 0.933, which suggesting that the stock is 6.749% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radian Group has a beta of 0.750, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.023%.

MGIC Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. Radian Group offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. MGIC Investment pays 17.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Radian Group pays out 25.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGIC Investment quarterly revenues are $301.4M, which are smaller than Radian Group quarterly revenues of $316.3M. MGIC Investment's net income of $184.7M is higher than Radian Group's net income of $148.3M. Notably, MGIC Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.54x while Radian Group's PE ratio is 8.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGIC Investment is 5.42x versus 3.95x for Radian Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 61.27% compared to MGIC Investment's net margin of 2.86%. MGIC Investment's return on equity of 14.81% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.62%.

MGIC Investment has a consensus price target of $27.14, signalling upside risk potential of 9.54%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -11.26%. Given that MGIC Investment has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe MGIC Investment is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

MGIC Investment has a beta of 0.933, which suggesting that the stock is 6.749% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.188, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.241%.

MGIC Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. MGIC Investment pays 17.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGIC Investment quarterly revenues are $301.4M, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $284.7M. MGIC Investment's net income of $184.7M is higher than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $8.1M. Notably, MGIC Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.54x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 16.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGIC Investment is 5.42x versus 1.05x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 61.27% compared to MGIC Investment's net margin of 15.48%. MGIC Investment's return on equity of 14.81% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01%.

MGIC Investment has a consensus price target of $27.14, signalling upside risk potential of 9.54%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $65.26 which suggests that it could fall by -8.3%. Given that MGIC Investment has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe MGIC Investment is more attractive than WR Berkley.

MGIC Investment has a beta of 0.933, which suggesting that the stock is 6.749% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.537%.

MGIC Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. MGIC Investment pays 17.1% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGIC Investment quarterly revenues are $301.4M, which are smaller than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.7B. MGIC Investment's net income of $184.7M is lower than WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M. Notably, MGIC Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.54x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 16.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGIC Investment is 5.42x versus 2.09x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.