RGA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CNO Financial Group has a net margin of 2.85% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of 15.14%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.07% beat CNO Financial Group's return on equity of 16.56%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $242.09, signalling upside risk potential of 35.9%. On the other hand CNO Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $43.83 which suggests that it could grow by 19.15%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than CNO Financial Group, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than CNO Financial Group.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.697, which suggesting that the stock is 30.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNO Financial Group has a beta of 0.897, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.268%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.98%. CNO Financial Group offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 31.94% of its earnings as a dividend. CNO Financial Group pays out 16.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than CNO Financial Group quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $148M is lower than CNO Financial Group's net income of $166.1M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.59x while CNO Financial Group's PE ratio is 9.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.54x versus 0.89x for CNO Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Equitable Holdings has a net margin of 2.85% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of 24.83%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.07% beat Equitable Holdings's return on equity of 27.07%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $242.09, signalling upside risk potential of 35.9%. On the other hand Equitable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $62.90 which suggests that it could grow by 35.53%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than Equitable Holdings, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than Equitable Holdings.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.697, which suggesting that the stock is 30.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equitable Holdings has a beta of 1.231, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.147%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.98%. Equitable Holdings offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 31.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Equitable Holdings pays out 29.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Equitable Holdings quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $148M is lower than Equitable Holdings's net income of $899M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.59x while Equitable Holdings's PE ratio is 12.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.54x versus 1.21x for Equitable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National has a net margin of 2.85% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of 33.18%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.07% beat Lincoln National's return on equity of 41.29%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $242.09, signalling upside risk potential of 35.9%. On the other hand Lincoln National has an analysts' consensus of $37.82 which suggests that it could grow by 28.2%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.697, which suggesting that the stock is 30.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National has a beta of 1.560, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.014%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.98%. Lincoln National offers a yield of 6.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 31.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National pays out 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Lincoln National quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $148M is lower than Lincoln National's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.59x while Lincoln National's PE ratio is 1.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.54x versus 0.28x for Lincoln National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unum Group has a net margin of 2.85% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of 10.88%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.07% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 17.03%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $242.09, signalling upside risk potential of 35.9%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $92.54 which suggests that it could grow by 22.96%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than Unum Group, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than Unum Group.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.697, which suggesting that the stock is 30.269% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.458, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.171%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.98%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 31.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 16.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $148M is lower than Unum Group's net income of $348.7M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.59x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 7.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.54x versus 1.11x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.