RNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Axis Capital Holdings has a net margin of 29.8% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of 11.89%. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 22.92% beat Axis Capital Holdings's return on equity of 11.72%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $294.18, signalling upside risk potential of 17.97%. On the other hand Axis Capital Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $104.67 which suggests that it could grow by 16.26%. Given that RenaissanceRe Holdings has higher upside potential than Axis Capital Holdings, analysts believe RenaissanceRe Holdings is more attractive than Axis Capital Holdings.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 59.003% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Axis Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.942, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.821%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Axis Capital Holdings offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Axis Capital Holdings pays out 48.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Axis Capital Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $1.2B is higher than Axis Capital Holdings's net income of $180.7M. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.59x while Axis Capital Holdings's PE ratio is 12.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 1.02x versus 1.32x for Axis Capital Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enstar Group has a net margin of 29.8% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of 40.78%. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 22.92% beat Enstar Group's return on equity of 18.07%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $294.18, signalling upside risk potential of 17.97%. On the other hand Enstar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -68.94%. Given that RenaissanceRe Holdings has higher upside potential than Enstar Group, analysts believe RenaissanceRe Holdings is more attractive than Enstar Group.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 59.003% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enstar Group has a beta of 0.646, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.446%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Enstar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group pays out 3.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Enstar Group quarterly revenues of $385M. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $1.2B is higher than Enstar Group's net income of $157M. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.59x while Enstar Group's PE ratio is 4.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 1.02x versus 3.67x for Enstar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hiscox has a net margin of 29.8% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of --. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 22.92% beat Hiscox's return on equity of 22.74%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $294.18, signalling upside risk potential of 17.97%. On the other hand Hiscox has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RenaissanceRe Holdings has higher upside potential than Hiscox, analysts believe RenaissanceRe Holdings is more attractive than Hiscox.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 59.003% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hiscox has a beta of 0.281, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.917%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Hiscox offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Hiscox pays out 17.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Hiscox quarterly revenues of --. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $1.2B is higher than Hiscox's net income of --. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.59x while Hiscox's PE ratio is 6.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 1.02x versus 1.34x for Hiscox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SiriusPoint has a net margin of 29.8% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of 1.52%. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 22.92% beat SiriusPoint's return on equity of 12.28%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $294.18, signalling upside risk potential of 17.97%. On the other hand SiriusPoint has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -9.79%. Given that RenaissanceRe Holdings has higher upside potential than SiriusPoint, analysts believe RenaissanceRe Holdings is more attractive than SiriusPoint.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.410, which suggesting that the stock is 59.003% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SiriusPoint has a beta of 0.987, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.312%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. SiriusPoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. SiriusPoint pays out 4.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than SiriusPoint quarterly revenues of $559.2M. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $1.2B is higher than SiriusPoint's net income of $8.5M. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.59x while SiriusPoint's PE ratio is 9.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 1.02x versus 0.97x for SiriusPoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.