SMG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of -58.84% compared to The Scotts Miracle Gro's net margin of -0.63%. The Scotts Miracle Gro's return on equity of -- beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

The Scotts Miracle Gro has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.22%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Scotts Miracle Gro has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe The Scotts Miracle Gro is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

The Scotts Miracle Gro has a beta of 1.711, which suggesting that the stock is 71.083% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.002%.

The Scotts Miracle Gro has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. The Scotts Miracle Gro pays -433.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Scotts Miracle Gro quarterly revenues are $414.7M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. The Scotts Miracle Gro's net income of -$244M is lower than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, The Scotts Miracle Gro's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 13.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Scotts Miracle Gro is 1.08x versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of -58.84% compared to The Scotts Miracle Gro's net margin of 1.61%. The Scotts Miracle Gro's return on equity of -- beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2%.

The Scotts Miracle Gro has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.22%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $67.33 which suggests that it could grow by 15.07%. Given that The Scotts Miracle Gro has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe The Scotts Miracle Gro is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

The Scotts Miracle Gro has a beta of 1.711, which suggesting that the stock is 71.083% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.328, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.793%.

The Scotts Miracle Gro has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. The Scotts Miracle Gro pays -433.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

The Scotts Miracle Gro quarterly revenues are $414.7M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $747.7M. The Scotts Miracle Gro's net income of -$244M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M. Notably, The Scotts Miracle Gro's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 24.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Scotts Miracle Gro is 1.08x versus 0.38x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -58.84% compared to The Scotts Miracle Gro's net margin of --. The Scotts Miracle Gro's return on equity of -- beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

The Scotts Miracle Gro has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.22%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 259.6%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than The Scotts Miracle Gro, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than The Scotts Miracle Gro.

The Scotts Miracle Gro has a beta of 1.711, which suggesting that the stock is 71.083% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.854, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.435%.

The Scotts Miracle Gro has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Scotts Miracle Gro pays -433.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Scotts Miracle Gro quarterly revenues are $414.7M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. The Scotts Miracle Gro's net income of -$244M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, The Scotts Miracle Gro's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Scotts Miracle Gro is 1.08x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -58.84% compared to The Scotts Miracle Gro's net margin of --. The Scotts Miracle Gro's return on equity of -- beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

The Scotts Miracle Gro has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.22%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 151.21%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than The Scotts Miracle Gro, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than The Scotts Miracle Gro.

The Scotts Miracle Gro has a beta of 1.711, which suggesting that the stock is 71.083% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.55%.

The Scotts Miracle Gro has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Scotts Miracle Gro pays -433.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Scotts Miracle Gro quarterly revenues are $414.7M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. The Scotts Miracle Gro's net income of -$244M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, The Scotts Miracle Gro's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Scotts Miracle Gro is 1.08x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.