CF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nucor has a net margin of 20.15% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of 3.36%. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 14.37% beat Nucor's return on equity of 11.62%.

CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $88.99, signalling upside risk potential of 4.58%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $162.96 which suggests that it could grow by 37.36%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings.

CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.108% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.552, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.201%.

CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 20.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 11.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.4B. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $276M is higher than Nucor's net income of $249.9M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.46x while Nucor's PE ratio is 11.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.63x versus 0.92x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance has a net margin of 20.15% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of 5.82%. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 14.37% beat Reliance's return on equity of 13.57%.

CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $88.99, signalling upside risk potential of 4.58%. On the other hand Reliance has an analysts' consensus of $323.10 which suggests that it could grow by 19.09%. Given that Reliance has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe Reliance is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings.

CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.108% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance has a beta of 0.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.062%.

CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Reliance offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 20.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance pays out 17.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Reliance quarterly revenues of $3.4B. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $276M is higher than Reliance's net income of $199.2M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.46x while Reliance's PE ratio is 14.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.63x versus 1.10x for Reliance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Scotts Miracle Gro has a net margin of 20.15% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of -58.84%. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 14.37% beat The Scotts Miracle Gro's return on equity of --.

CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $88.99, signalling upside risk potential of 4.58%. On the other hand The Scotts Miracle Gro has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.28%. Given that The Scotts Miracle Gro has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe The Scotts Miracle Gro is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings.

CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.108% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Scotts Miracle Gro has a beta of 1.711, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.083%.

CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. The Scotts Miracle Gro offers a yield of 3.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 20.39% of its earnings as a dividend. The Scotts Miracle Gro pays out -433.52% of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than The Scotts Miracle Gro quarterly revenues of $414.7M. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $276M is higher than The Scotts Miracle Gro's net income of -$244M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.46x while The Scotts Miracle Gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.63x versus 1.08x for The Scotts Miracle Gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 20.15% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of 7.32%. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 14.37% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 19.51%.

CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $88.99, signalling upside risk potential of 4.58%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $138.33 which suggests that it could grow by 18.14%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings.

CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.108% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.310, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.033%.

CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 20.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 11.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.3B. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $276M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $317.8M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.46x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 10.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.63x versus 1.04x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.