SMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cummins has a net margin of -3675.58% compared to NuScale Power's net margin of 9.57%. NuScale Power's return on equity of -64.73% beat Cummins's return on equity of 19.56%.

NuScale Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -6.85%. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $377.16 which suggests that it could grow by 7.34%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than NuScale Power, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than NuScale Power.

NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.752%.

NuScale Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cummins offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. NuScale Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 125.31% of its earnings as a dividend.

NuScale Power quarterly revenues are $475K, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.5B. NuScale Power's net income of -$17.5M is lower than Cummins's net income of $809M. Notably, NuScale Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cummins's PE ratio is 23.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NuScale Power is 228.46x versus 1.44x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a net margin of -3675.58% compared to NuScale Power's net margin of --. NuScale Power's return on equity of -64.73% beat Hydrogen Engine Center's return on equity of --.

NuScale Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -6.85%. On the other hand Hydrogen Engine Center has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NuScale Power has higher upside potential than Hydrogen Engine Center, analysts believe NuScale Power is more attractive than Hydrogen Engine Center.

NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrogen Engine Center has a beta of 20.670, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1967.037%.

NuScale Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hydrogen Engine Center offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NuScale Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrogen Engine Center pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NuScale Power quarterly revenues are $475K, which are larger than Hydrogen Engine Center quarterly revenues of --. NuScale Power's net income of -$17.5M is higher than Hydrogen Engine Center's net income of --. Notably, NuScale Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hydrogen Engine Center's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NuScale Power is 228.46x versus -- for Hydrogen Engine Center. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a net margin of -3675.58% compared to NuScale Power's net margin of --. NuScale Power's return on equity of -64.73% beat Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of --.

NuScale Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -6.85%. On the other hand Nano Nuclear Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 130.25%. Given that Nano Nuclear Energy has higher upside potential than NuScale Power, analysts believe Nano Nuclear Energy is more attractive than NuScale Power.

NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NuScale Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nano Nuclear Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NuScale Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nano Nuclear Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NuScale Power quarterly revenues are $475K, which are larger than Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues of --. NuScale Power's net income of -$17.5M is lower than Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$4.7M. Notably, NuScale Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nano Nuclear Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NuScale Power is 228.46x versus -- for Nano Nuclear Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Disc has a net margin of -3675.58% compared to NuScale Power's net margin of -3.79%. NuScale Power's return on equity of -64.73% beat Twin Disc's return on equity of 6.3%.

NuScale Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -6.85%. On the other hand Twin Disc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25%. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than NuScale Power, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than NuScale Power.

NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Disc has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.147%.

NuScale Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Disc offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. NuScale Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NuScale Power quarterly revenues are $475K, which are smaller than Twin Disc quarterly revenues of $72.9M. NuScale Power's net income of -$17.5M is lower than Twin Disc's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, NuScale Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Twin Disc's PE ratio is 17.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NuScale Power is 228.46x versus 0.55x for Twin Disc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.