HYEG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cummins has a net margin of -- compared to Hydrogen Engine Center's net margin of 4.95%. Hydrogen Engine Center's return on equity of -- beat Cummins's return on equity of 37.07%.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $377.97 which suggests that it could grow by 27.97%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than Hydrogen Engine Center, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than Hydrogen Engine Center.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a beta of 23.199, which suggesting that the stock is 2219.914% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.555%.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cummins offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. Hydrogen Engine Center pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hydrogen Engine Center quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.4B. Hydrogen Engine Center's net income of -- is lower than Cummins's net income of $418M. Notably, Hydrogen Engine Center's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cummins's PE ratio is 10.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrogen Engine Center is -- versus 1.20x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -- compared to Hydrogen Engine Center's net margin of -20.76%. Hydrogen Engine Center's return on equity of -- beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hydrogen Engine Center has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Hydrogen Engine Center is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a beta of 23.199, which suggesting that the stock is 2219.914% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.163, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.682%.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Hydrogen Engine Center pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hydrogen Engine Center quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. Hydrogen Engine Center's net income of -- is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Hydrogen Engine Center's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrogen Engine Center is -- versus 0.38x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NuScale Power has a net margin of -- compared to Hydrogen Engine Center's net margin of -219.07%. Hydrogen Engine Center's return on equity of -- beat NuScale Power's return on equity of -76.36%.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NuScale Power has an analysts' consensus of $24.46 which suggests that it could grow by 72.98%. Given that NuScale Power has higher upside potential than Hydrogen Engine Center, analysts believe NuScale Power is more attractive than Hydrogen Engine Center.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a beta of 23.199, which suggesting that the stock is 2219.914% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NuScale Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hydrogen Engine Center pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NuScale Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hydrogen Engine Center quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NuScale Power quarterly revenues of $34.2M. Hydrogen Engine Center's net income of -- is lower than NuScale Power's net income of -$75M. Notably, Hydrogen Engine Center's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NuScale Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrogen Engine Center is -- versus 35.59x for NuScale Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Disc has a net margin of -- compared to Hydrogen Engine Center's net margin of 1.02%. Hydrogen Engine Center's return on equity of -- beat Twin Disc's return on equity of 6.23%.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Twin Disc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 104.08%. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than Hydrogen Engine Center, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than Hydrogen Engine Center.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a beta of 23.199, which suggesting that the stock is 2219.914% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Disc has a beta of 0.563, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.739%.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Disc offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Hydrogen Engine Center pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hydrogen Engine Center quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Twin Disc quarterly revenues of $89.9M. Hydrogen Engine Center's net income of -- is lower than Twin Disc's net income of $919K. Notably, Hydrogen Engine Center's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Twin Disc's PE ratio is 10.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hydrogen Engine Center is -- versus 0.32x for Twin Disc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.