UBER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of 57.56% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of 17.09%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 63.2% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $89.10, signalling upside risk potential of 25.15%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $377.96 which suggests that it could grow by 32.81%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Uber Technologies.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.391, which suggesting that the stock is 39.134% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.353, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.323%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $12B, which are larger than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $10B. Uber Technologies's net income of $6.9B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.61x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 44.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 3.45x versus 7.31x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 57.56% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of 34.62%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 63.2% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $89.10, signalling upside risk potential of 25.15%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $506.25 which suggests that it could grow by 32.09%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Uber Technologies.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.391, which suggesting that the stock is 39.134% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.215%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $12B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. Uber Technologies's net income of $6.9B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.61x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 30.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 3.45x versus 10.94x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategy has a net margin of 57.56% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of -555.78%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 63.2% beat Strategy's return on equity of -19.84%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $89.10, signalling upside risk potential of 25.15%. On the other hand Strategy has an analysts' consensus of $513.01 which suggests that it could grow by 95.4%. Given that Strategy has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, analysts believe Strategy is more attractive than Uber Technologies.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.391, which suggesting that the stock is 39.134% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategy has a beta of 3.359, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 235.909%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strategy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $12B, which are larger than Strategy quarterly revenues of $120.7M. Uber Technologies's net income of $6.9B is higher than Strategy's net income of -$670.8M. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.61x while Strategy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 3.45x versus 109.04x for Strategy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of 57.56% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of 20.78%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 63.2% beat Oracle's return on equity of 104.49%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $89.10, signalling upside risk potential of 25.15%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $185.66 which suggests that it could grow by 23.62%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than Oracle.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.391, which suggesting that the stock is 39.134% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.149%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $12B, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Uber Technologies's net income of $6.9B is higher than Oracle's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.61x while Oracle's PE ratio is 35.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 3.45x versus 7.73x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.